Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
I believe this is conceptual problem, described here:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200304/msg00019.html
quote:
Missing semantics for <AttributeAssignment> child elements
Reported by Satoshi Hada
Message: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml-comment/200302/msg00020.html
Message: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml-comment/200302/msg00021.html
Message: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml-comment/200302/msg00022.html
Description: The semantics for the child elements of an
<AttributeSelector> are not specified, although three different
kinds of child elements are used in the example Rule 3 in Section
4.2.4.3.
Options: Specify the semantics in Section "5.36 Element
<AttributeAssignment>" [exact wording TBD]
See the messages reported by Satoshi Hada pinpointing the problem.
Original comment by marek.ho...@gmail.com
on 9 Sep 2008 at 10:32
I was thinking of the solution of this problem.
The AttributeValue schema is the following:
<xs:complexType name="AttributeValueType" mixed="true">
<xs:complexContent mixed="true">
<xs:extension base="xacml:ExpressionType">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:any namespace="##any" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0"
maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
</xs:sequence>
<xs:attribute name="DataType" type="xs:anyURI" use="required"/>
<xs:anyAttribute namespace="##any" processContents="lax"/>
</xs:extension>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>
which means AttributeValue may contain any xml element. I think one of the
possible
solutions could be adding the ability of setting any object inside
AttributeValue,
which could be the place for storing multiple AttributeValues in
AttributeAssignment
(AttributeAssignment extends the AttributeValue element).
Currently we do have AttributeValue#typedValue but it is strictly checked
against
registered types and it seems to be rather difficult to store AttributeValues[]
as
typedValue.
Original comment by marek.ho...@gmail.com
on 9 Sep 2008 at 10:50
Original comment by ppz...@gmail.com
on 30 Sep 2008 at 7:42
uhhh .... how and why do you evaluation an Obligation???? That's not defined
ANYWHERE
in the xacml spec. Just a thought as I was browsing the site....
Original comment by michael....@gmail.com
on 7 Apr 2009 at 10:05
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
marek.ho...@gmail.com
on 9 Sep 2008 at 9:22