Open YuanTingHsieh opened 6 years ago
In your paper, the ATIS Dataset The "Atten Base Liu and Lane 2016" is reported as F1 94.2, Intent Accuracy 91, Sentence Accuracy 78.9
while in their paper and this new paper
is reported as F1 95.98 and Intent Accuracy 98.21
I wonder if your experiment setting is different from theirs? Could you kindly explain this?
Thank you!
I noticed that this implement used 500 samples from training data as validation set.
Find solid baselines in https://github.com/sz128/slot_filling_and_intent_detection_of_SLU.
In your paper, the ATIS Dataset The "Atten Base Liu and Lane 2016" is reported as F1 94.2, Intent Accuracy 91, Sentence Accuracy 78.9
while in their paper and this new paper
is reported as F1 95.98 and Intent Accuracy 98.21
I wonder if your experiment setting is different from theirs? Could you kindly explain this?
Thank you!