Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
[deleted comment]
I confirm the problem exists also with G3 galleries.
Original comment by PataGoni...@gmail.com
on 23 Dec 2010 at 11:26
hello !
could any of you provide more details ?
For example, a sample gallery url with the expected album order (date or alpha,
etc...) and what is the order observed (date or alpha, etc or completely
random).
Then, I'll be able to investigate if it the remote API that doe snot return in
the right order, or if it ReGalAndroid that does not keep the order...
thanks
Original comment by anthony....@gmail.com
on 4 Jan 2011 at 4:22
Look at my gallery via the web browser. All the top level albums are in
descending order by year, the first one being 2011 followed by 2010, 2009, etc.
Now look at the same gallery in your app and you will see the albums are top to
bottom: 2009, 2008, 2007 back to 2002 then it goes to 1998. 2001 is way down
the list and 2011 is last.
http://www.willowville.net/gallery
Thank you for looking into this. Even with the 'annoyances', ReGalAndroid is
shaping into a very nice app (one I would buy).
Original comment by 2...@willowville.net
on 4 Jan 2011 at 4:34
In my G3-Gallery, the order is "manually". In the App, I can't find out, which
order is used!
If you like to test it on my gallery, I can send you a login for testing.
(and by the way, thanks for your great work)
Original comment by PataGoni...@gmail.com
on 5 Jan 2011 at 11:18
In version 1.0.1 the problem is still there..
Can you reproduce the problem?
If you need more information, let me know if I can help..
Original comment by PataGoni...@gmail.com
on 2 Feb 2011 at 11:40
This is a pretty serious issue for me -- I have a *lot* of folders,
and the current jumble is much too painful to navigate.
My Gallery 2: http://photos.navas.us
My top-level album order is Name > Descending with No presort
My default Theme order (for most sub-albums) is Name > Ascending with Albums
First
ReGalAndroid presents this order: 145-137, 146, 133-095, 109 ... etc.
Original comment by john.na...@gmail.com
on 6 Mar 2011 at 4:26
Original comment by anthony....@gmail.com
on 20 Apr 2011 at 4:23
Why the heck was the Priority dropped to Low?!
It's a pretty serious issue for people like me,
making the app pretty much useless!
Original comment by john.na...@gmail.com
on 20 Apr 2011 at 5:10
hello,
I'm the only developer working on this app; and as I develop this app on my
free time, for free, I set the priority according to the time I have and the
stuff I would like to see in the app.
if you want to investigate and provide the fix, I'd be happy to review it.
I may work on it if nobody does; question is when.
Original comment by anthony....@gmail.com
on 20 Apr 2011 at 5:36
Anthony,
The way g3 sorts the albums and images is by the column weight.
is there away you can add this, looking through a couple of examples on the
gallery site they use
public boolean isManualSort() {
return m_Sort.equalsIgnoreCase("weight");
}
I know that's not the correct syntax but hope it helps solve this issue.
Original comment by edbe...@gmail.com
on 27 Apr 2011 at 8:47
"... as I develop this app on my free time, for free, I set the priority
according to the time I have and the stuff I would like to see in the app."
Fair enough. I'll lower my expectations (and rating) accordingly. I suggest you
make this clear in the description of the app.
Original comment by john.na...@gmail.com
on 27 Apr 2011 at 1:54
Come on John, its a free app. It is open sourced as well. If you want to help
you can fix the problems yourself. I may just do this if I have time in the
next few weeks.
In my opinion (remember, its just an opinion), the focus should be on the core
functionality until it works correctly. Adding new features is pointless if
the core product is hard to use (incorrect sorting makes it hard to use).
Original comment by 2...@willowville.net
on 27 Apr 2011 at 2:16
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
2...@willowville.net
on 20 Dec 2010 at 12:38