Closed DjebbZ closed 10 years ago
See #7
This is breaking the online version .sample should be force added as images.js
Yep.
I didn't know about add --force
, hope it will do the trick.
You can remove the .sample & adjust the README ;)
Yep
If I remove the sample, will people still have the original images.js to play with ?
Yes, but editing images.js is visible by git, even if in .gitignore (I deleted and re-downloaded my fork to test).
Well done. Thanks !
Oh.
Weird.
Indeed.
Maybe, reverting to previous commit, and manually add the really ignored images.js
file will do the trick ?
online version need the file to be versionned (for now). Not sure what is the best way to handle that. Anyway, it's a step. I would like to drop this manual file for the long run (see https://github.com/putaindecode/pretty-new-tab/issues/7#issuecomment-57624906)
Sorry for the weird situation I put you in...
Not a big deal.
The best way would be to have master which compiles to gh-pages and add images.js in it.
Nice idea ! A post-commit hook ?
or gulp-gh-pages.
Can I leave this stuff to you guys ?
Yesh.
Yeah we will end up that way: clean decoupled code Here is a issue to discuss about that
Thanks ! I need to get back to work (you know, the "real world" :/ :D)
Here you go. Tested successfully in my local Firefox.