Open isabelle-dr opened 2 years ago
Comment by barbeau October 30, 2017
More comments on a proposal regarding needing to better specify changes to trips, including changes to stop_sequence:
Comment by barbeau Aug 06, 2018
Also, it looks like Google and some producers are supporting changing stop_ids in the real-time feed to represent changing platforms at stations, when a platform assignment isn't known at static GTFS build time: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/gtfs-realtime/BZOfsVeI2Cc/gIUjGbkCBAAJ
In this case, changing from the parent station ID to the child stop ID is supported, which means that the stop sequence/ID pairing won't match GTFS by definition.
Comment by minhhpham Sept 29, 2018
We performed an analysis using transit-feed-quality-calculator and found these agencies that have stop/stop_sequence mismatch:
Feed | Location |
---|---|
Cincinnati Metro Trip Updates | Cincinnati, OH, USA |
HART Trip Updates | Tampa, FL, USA |
Saskatoon Transit Trip Updates | Saskatoon, SK, Canada |
LTD Trip Updates | Eugene, OR, USA |
VIA Trip Updates | San Antonio, TX, USA |
ETS Trip Updates | Edmonton, AB, Canada |
MST Trip Updates | Monterey, CA, USA |
MBTA Trip Updates | Boston, MA, USA |
Comment by barbeau December 13, 2022
Per the discussion of supporting real-time stop assignments in GTFS Realtime (see proposal PR google/transit#219), we agreed NOT to enforce stop/stop_sequence pairing matching in the GTFS Realtime spec. If this changes, it will be part of the GTFS Service Changes v3.1 spec. So our rule in the validator related to this needs to change.
Given that stop/stop_sequence pairing is a common error in feeds, but as discussed above there are also cases used in practice that the spec is silent on, I propose we make this a warning instead of error.
Specifically, the community adopted an official experimental practice that should replace the undocumented practice of platform changes - see https://github.com/google/transit/pull/219. We should warn producers using the undocumented practice that they should switch to the official experimental method of platform changes. This should help increase adoption of the experimental method.
Issue by barbeau October 20, 2017 Originally opened as https://github.com/CUTR-at-USF/gtfs-realtime-validator/issues/297
Summary:
We currently have rule "E045 - GTFS-rt stop_time_update stop_sequence and stop_id do not match GTFS" for this, but after this discussion it doesn't look like this is explictlly mentioned in the spec - see: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/gtfs-realtime/BZOfsVeI2Cc
And StopTimeUpdate docs: https://github.com/google/transit/blob/master/gtfs-realtime/spec/en/reference.md#message-stoptimeupdate
A point to clarify in the current spec, and potential part of a proposal to add trips with new geometries dynamically, or a proposal to identify child stops of stations.
Note that changes in stop_sequence would also affect VehiclePosition.current_stop_sequence: https://github.com/google/transit/blob/master/gtfs-realtime/spec/en/reference.md#message-vehicleposition