MobilityData / mobility-database-catalogs

The Catalogs of Sources of the Mobility Database.
Apache License 2.0
257 stars 51 forks source link

1.0 Release plan #30

Open emmambd opened 2 years ago

emmambd commented 2 years ago

This is an issue for planning the 1.0 release of the catalogs. It will be updated as we plan and develop the next release. Please share with us below your needs and ideas! 💡

You can see the current status of work by looking at the issues tagged as V1 in our sprint board. If you'd like to contribute to this release, please get in touch with Emma at emma@mobilitydata.org.

Goals for the release 🎯

What is outside the scope for this release

Considerations

Materials

The working document used to design this feature is available at https://bit.ly/v1-catalogs-working-doc. Feel free to leave comments directly in it!

The release’s priorities were based on the user research analysis MobilityData conducted in late 2021 and early 2022.

Shubham9494 commented 2 years ago

Hello @emmambd this repo shows https://github.com/MobilityData/mobility-database-catalogs/tree/issue/343/catalogs-prototype 404 error

emmambd commented 2 years ago

Hi @Shubham9494 - I've updated the link in TransitFeeds-Public so it points to the repo rather than an old branch. You should be able to view it now. Let me know if you have any issues still.

HTenkanen commented 2 years ago

Hi @emmambd, the release plan mentions that archiving datasets is not part of the plan. Is the idea to drop archiving GTFS feeds altogether (i.e. what transitfeeds.com does now) or how is it? Having access to historical GTFS feeds is extremely important for research purposes, hence, I'm interested to understand whether such dramatic change is likely to happen.

It seems #136 is dealing with this issue (?), but is the idea to also move the old TransitFeeds archive to this new system?

emmambd commented 2 years ago

Hi @HTenkanen - thanks for reaching out. Archiving datasets is not part of this release but is a part of the overall vision of the new system. It's included in the roadmap here.

#136 will provide a listing of historical URLs but it would not actually store archived data.

Let me know if you have any questions, and feel free to share feedback on the roadmap.