Closed m-challenger closed 8 years ago
Dear Moharram, dear Ferhat,
is there already a draft agenda for the review and if so where ?
Thanks
Claire
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Moharram Challenger < notifications@github.com> wrote:
We need to invitation the reviewers, with the time frame and draft agenda (see detailed review guidelines, cf. https://itea3.org/community/publication/overview/category-2/type-15.html): This is already one week late (if I’m not wrong). So, we should provide a time frame and an agenda for the ITEA review meeting.
The following persons will attend and should be put as addressees (see calendar item on the ITEA Community website): · Chairman: Philippe Letellier (philippe.letellier@itea3.org), · Reviewers: Christoph Niedermeier (christoph.niedermeier@siemens.com) and Jos Van Sas (josephus.van_sas@alcatel-lucent.com), · External reviewer: not yet assigned (please also invite the consortium contact within the local Public Authorities) · Mentor: Marie-Line Valentin (marie-line.valentin@airbus.com) · Programme coordinator: Marc Sturzel (marc.sturzel@itea3.org)
The project review for ModelWriter will take place on the 24th of September in Brussels. As a reminder, §4 of the review guidelines (cf. https://itea3.org/community/publication/overview/category-2/type-15.html) indicates several deadlines that relate to project reviews. Applied to your project review, these deadlines become the followings:
-
24/08/2015 (one month before the review): invitation email to the reviewers, indicating all organisational aspects (see review guidelines for details);
-
24/08/2015 (one month before the review): submission of a CR, if relevant and required to put the online data in conformance with the project reality;
-
10/09/2015 (two weeks before the review): notification email to the reviewers, indicating which deliverables are public ones, and which are SotA ones (which implies these deliverables need to be uploaded on the Community website prior to the email);
-
17/09/2015 (one week before the review): notification email to the reviewers, indicating the link to a draft version of the presentations (slides);
-
22/09/2015 (a few days before the review): final checks (see review guidelines for details).
@ModelWriter/consortium https://github.com/orgs/ModelWriter/teams/consortium
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/ModelWriter/WP5/issues/92.
Claire Gardent CNRS
Tel. +33 3 83 59 20 39 Fax +33 3 83 41 30 79 http://www.loria.fr/~gardent
LORIA UMR 7503 Equipe SYNALP, Bat. B 615, rue du jardin botanique 54600 Villers lès Nancy France
@ModelWriter/consortium
Dear Ferhat,
thanks for the agenda. Looks fine to me. I will present for WP2, Mariem will do the demo.
I have two questions:
Best
Claire
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Ferhat Erata notifications@github.com wrote:
The draft timetable and agenda for the 1st ITEA review meeting (9:00am-12:00pm):
Introduction (15 Min): 9:00
- The project idea,
- The consortium structure (maybe efforts and costs)
- Project industrialization triangle and business market
- Overall to the progress
- The schedule of the day 2.
UC presentations (5 min each => 45min): 9:15
France
- UC-FR-01: Synchronization between Models and Documentation (OBEO)
- UC-FR-02: Enterprise Architecture (OBEO)
- UC-FR-03: Synchronization of regulation documentation with a design rule repository(Airbus)
- UC-FR-04: Production of a context specific design document (Airbus)
- Turkey
- UC-TR-01: Production of a proposal in response to an IPA Invitation To Tender (HISBIM)
- UC-TR-02: Collaborative production of a proposal for an IPA project (HISBIM)
- UC-TR-03: Synchronization of ReqIF models from requirement specifications(Havelsan)
- UC-TR-04: Requirement Engineering for System Modelling (KocSistem)
- UC-TR-05: Synchronous Business Process Design with Use Cases (UNIT)
- Belgium
- UC-BE-01: Requirements IT (Sogeti)
- UC-BE-02: Automated test generation (Sogeti) 3.
Progress of the Project in WP base (10 min each => 1h): 10:00
WP1: Industrial Use Cases and Requirements (AIRBUS)
- Software requirements
- User requirements
- WP2: Semantic Parsing and Generation of Documents and Documents Components (LORIA)
- WP3: Model to/from Knowledge Base Transformation (UNIT)
- WP4: Knowledge Base Design and Implementation (MANTIS)
- WP5: Project Management (UNIT)
- Source Code Management
- Document Management
- Project Controls
- Collaboration Management
- Workshops
- WP6: ModelWriter Architecture, Integration and Evaluation (OBEO)
- WP7: Standardization, Dissemination and Exploitation (Obeo)
- Academic talk: ATSEN conference
- Industrial talk: A demo paper in UYMS workshop
- New industrial partner: Havelsan
- New under-negotiation industrial partner: FORD-Otosan, Turkey 4.
Break (15 min): 11:00 5.
Demonstrations (30 min): 11:15
Model Editor
- Writer Editor
- Marking and Mapping mechanism
- Semantic parsing and consistency check
- Alloy based controls
- Import/Export Connectors
- UC demonstrations 6.
Reviewing the deliverables (15 Min): 11:45 7.
Q&A (30 min): 12:00 8.
Participants from project (13-14 People):
- UNIT: Ferhat Erata, Dr. Moharram Challenger
- KOÇSISTEM: Prof. Geylani Kardas, Hale Gezgen,
- MANTIS: Prof. Erhan Mengüsoğlu
- HISBIM: Prof. Ersan Gürdoğan, Taskin Kızıl
- OBEO: Etienne Juliot, Yvan Lussaud
- AIRBUS: Dr. Anne Monceaux
- LORIA: Prof. Claire Gardent, Prof. Samuel CRUZ-LARA, and Dr. Mariem Mahfoudh
- HAVELSAN: Dr. Eray Tuzun
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/ModelWriter/WP5/issues/92#issuecomment-138214415.
Claire Gardent CNRS
Tel. +33 3 83 59 20 39 Fax +33 3 83 41 30 79 http://www.loria.fr/~gardent
LORIA UMR 7503 Equipe SYNALP, Bat. B 615, rue du jardin botanique 54600 Villers lès Nancy France
Dear @ClaireEMG,
You can use the template of this presentation:
https://github.com/ModelWriter/WP7/blob/master/Documents/ModelWriter%20Presentation%20v3.0.pptx
Since the slides of partners need to be merged and integrated, it would be good to have them at least one week before the review.
Thanks.
Ferhat
We need to invitation the reviewers, with the time frame and draft agenda (see detailed review guidelines, cf. https://itea3.org/community/publication/overview/category-2/type-15.html): This is already one week late (if I’m not wrong). So, we should provide a time frame and an agenda for the ITEA review meeting.
The following persons will attend and should be put as addressees (see calendar item on the ITEA Community website):
The project review for ModelWriter will take place on the 24th of September in Brussels. As a reminder, §4 of the review guidelines (cf. https://itea3.org/community/publication/overview/category-2/type-15.html) indicates several deadlines that relate to project reviews. Applied to your project review, these deadlines become the followings:
The meeting location: Eureka Secretariat, Neerveldstraat 107, 1200 Brussels, Belgium (you may also look for “Eureka Secretariat, Rue Neerveld, Bruxelles, Belgique” on Google Maps) It is already indicated on the review page (https://itea3.org/community/calendar/view/1867.html).
Also, we should ensure that the list of meeting attendees remains up-to-date on the ITEA community website (if necessary, by asking participants to register to the website if they don't yet have an account). Direct link to this list: https://itea3.org/community/calendar/view/1867.html#attendees (ensure attendees confirm their presence, too, on this website)
NB: in particular, you can use the “Select attendees from project” button on the page mentioned above.
Finally, ITEA strongly encourages us to check the latest version of the ITEA project review guidelines (not to hesitate to recheck the online version a couple of weeks before the review, as updates may occur): https://itea3.org/community/publication/overview/category-2/type-15.html
@ModelWriter/consortium