License on this code is...?

[jomo]

:+1: needs a License.

[ejm]

:+1: This is sort of an issue with ALL Mojang code (looks through GitHub)

[grum]

As said in the readme.

[DarkArc]

I presume you mean "This code is provided as a courtesy and feel free to build a client in another language to share with the community." ? That's kind of vague.

[ejm]

Yeah, I was thinking more an MIT or even Unlicense.org

On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 3:35 AM, Wyatt Childers notifications@github.comwrote:

I presume you mean "This code is provided as a courtesy and feel free to build a client in another language to share with the community." ? That's kind of vague.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/Mojang/AccountsClient/issues/8#issuecomment-40792548 .

[grum]

A piece of 'proof of concept' code for an API doesn't really need a license.

IANAL. Without a license you should consider it being under the strictest kind of license unless otherwise specified? If so; the readme should be enough.

[ejm]

Fair enough, I guess I will be porting this then :P

On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Erik Broes notifications@github.comwrote:

A piece of 'proof of concept' code for an API doesn't really need a license.

IANAL. Without a license you should consider it being under the strictest kind of license unless otherwise specified? If so; the readme should be enough.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/Mojang/AccountsClient/issues/8#issuecomment-40792617 .

[jomo]

From the GitHub TOS

Your profile and materials uploaded remain yours. However, by setting your pages to be viewed publicly, you agree to allow others to view your Content. By setting your repositories to be viewed publicly, you agree to allow others to view and fork your repositories.