Open adrianusler opened 3 months ago
[!IMPORTANT]
Review Skipped
Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.
Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the
.coderabbit.yaml
file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the@coderabbitai review
command.You can disable this status message by setting the
reviews.review_status
tofalse
in the CodeRabbit configuration file.
The update to the BuilderDialog
class introduces significant improvements in the molecule builder's functionality, focusing on the initialisation process, atom addition mechanics, and enhanced error handling. These changes aim to streamline the user experience by ensuring more accurate atom placements and efficient updates to the z-matrix, alongside addressing specific issues related to error messages when altering values in a table.
File(s) | Summary of Changes |
---|---|
.../Gui/builder.py |
Updated BuilderDialog class: new colliding_idx attribute, refined atom addition, and error handling |
Objective | Addressed | Explanation |
---|---|---|
#257: Error message when changing values in table | ❓ | It's unclear if the specific error messages were directly addressed without details on table edits. |
In the realm of code, where builders dare,
A rabbit hopped, with much to share.
🐰 "Behold," it said, "the changes vast,
Inbuilder.py
, improvements cast.
Atoms align, errors retreat,
With every line, our goals we meet.
Let's celebrate, for we've made it far,
In the world of code, we're a shining star!" 🌟
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
Attention: Patch coverage is 4.04040%
with 95 lines
in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 79.07%. Comparing base (
0aa342f
) to head (fc5b7d4
).
Files | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
src/molara/Gui/builder.py | 4.04% | 95 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
@adrianusler Will you add some tests for the builder or should we merge it as-is?
@ab5424 I'm not sure. Tests would be nice, but it's generally better not to wait to long with the merges...
Can you merge the main branch into this?
Since @GereonFeldmann is the original author, I think it would be best if he reviews the changes
I have actually just restructured the code and I am not sure why this solved the problem, but it seems like it did. Closes #257.
Summary by CodeRabbit