Closed MatthewGCampbell closed 3 years ago
Yet again we haven't seen anyone mention configs like this. Better place to check would probably be netgate forums or reddit.
I have a /29 block working - here's my setup, with OPNSense 20.1.7 and commit 90f5abb:
Excellent write-up @owenthewizard. Thank you for contributing.
Very much appreciated for your help, owenthewizard
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 17, 2020, at 2:18 AM, MonkWho notifications@github.com wrote: Excellent write-up @owenthewizard. Thank you for contributing.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
I forgot to add my source, I struggled with this for a while before I found this: https://reddit.com/r/PFSENSE/comments/c08qyt/wan_static_ip_issues/er34dkb. Gracious hat tip to that lady/gentleman!
I think adding this to the README could be useful - even though it's not directly related to the bypass. Thoughts?
This definitely looks like something that should be added to the readme. Unfortunately I don't have the time currently to write it up all nice and coherent. Could someone please write it up and create a pull request so I can just merge it?
I maybe could, I haven’t had time to play with it but this weekend I hope to get it working. Will ask for a pull request then.
This definitely looks like something that should be added to the readme. Unfortunately I don't have the time currently to write it up all nice and coherent. Could someone please write it up and create a pull request so I can just merge it?
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
Here is at least a starting point. On my PFSense box I do not have a Source
option on the new 1:1 rule page. Mine has Internal IP
and Destination
. I assume Internal IP
is correct?
If you have a static IPv4 block with AT&T, you can use it with your pfatt configuration. Note that in order to use your IPv4 block, you must set up your connection as stated above first. The normal installation, including setting up DHCP to get a public IP on the WAN interface, should be completed before the steps below.
/32
)if this helps any one this is what im trying to do. and here is my solution: Create a bridge including ix2 and ix3 Assign 34.33.48.21/29 to the new bridge interface (At this point your devices connected to ix2 and ix3 are online) Create a virtual interface on the bridge for 34.33.48.25 Create custom NAT rules to achieve the desired NAT for igb 1 (These last two steps can be skipped if you’re OK for the LAN devices to be NAT’d to 103.22.30.x)
I will try my best and add all of this to the read me, thanks guys for your help.
have a /29 block with AT&T and im trying to get it to pass the IPs through the NAT but im unsure if this needs a 1:1 nat, or just a basic nat rule to exclude the IPs from pfsenses NAT table, anyone have a setup like this? Trying to get the static ips to various physical interfaces and dont want to use vlans.