search

MonkWho / pfatt

Enable true bridge mode for AT&T U-Verse and pfSense (this is a fork of an original repository https://github.com/aus/pfatt. Since it is not available anymore, I'll do my best to maintain a copy for people that still need a bypass)
440 stars 171 forks source link

2.5.0 Compatibility? #37

Closed MatthewGCampbell closed 3 years ago

MatthewGCampbell commented 3 years ago

Doesn’t seem to work after upgrading to 2.5.5 is it just not compatible?

MonkWho commented 3 years ago

As far as compatibility with 2.5.0 goes. It was tested and reported in the issue #22 that a user had no issues upgrading 2.4.5-p1 to 2.5.0 and pfatt worked afterwards. I assume you mean pfSense 2.5.0 since there is no 2.5.5 as of yet?

Can you please provide more details about your upgrade? Also what bypass method are you using? Any errors when running paff script?

A-vesalius commented 3 years ago

Working fine for me on 2.5.0-DEVELOPMENT (amd64) built on Fri Oct 23. I've been updating 2.5 development every week or so and have had no issue with my bridged bypass.

MatthewGCampbell commented 3 years ago

Ok yeah I narrowed it down to a bridged interface I had setup on pfsense that was my issue.

MonkWho commented 3 years ago

@MatthewGCampbell and @A-vesalius if you still have your pFsense 2.5 set up and have some free time could you please test latest releases and see if you are experiencing same issue as being reported in #41?

MatthewGCampbell commented 3 years ago

Netgate won’t support a prod. 2.5.0 so I’m staying on 2.4.5, so I don’t think I’ll be able to test, as swapping out for my box running 2.5.0 would create a self inflicted internet outage, which while people are working from home isn’t the best idea, and I don’t have netgate support to back me up if any issues come up.

On Dec 2, 2020, at 1:17 PM, MonkWho notifications@github.com wrote:

 @MatthewGCampbell and @A-vesalius if you still have your pFsense 2.5 set up and have some free time could you please test latest releases and see if you are experiencing same issue as being reported in #41?

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

A-vesalius commented 3 years ago

@MatthewGCampbell and @A-vesalius if you still have your pFsense 2.5 set up and have some free time could you please test latest releases and see if you are experiencing same issue as being reported in #41?

Wish I could help, but I was using the bypass method previously and not supplicant. Beyond that since I was running on proxmox, just this weekend I switched to utilizing group_fwd_mask to bridge 802.1X traffic from RG and to ONT. I was way overthinking the complexity and it is really easy to setup on proxmox in the end. Can now test out whatever virtual router I want to get out through the ONT over vlan0.