Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Yes, known behavior; will consider generalizing. Patch welcome.
Original comment by Bil.K...@gmail.com
on 27 Sep 2007 at 12:42
I found the following in Robin Fairbairns' footmisc package -- it doesn't bode
well
for making sidenotes and twoside live in harmony:
1.3 Option side
This option (suggested by Frank Mittelbach) causes footnotes
to be typeset using the \marginpar command: this has the advantage
that the note appears close to its "call-up", but has all the
disadvantages associated with the \marginpar command (which consumes
`float' slots, and doesn’t always place itself correctly at the top
of pages in two-sided documents). Since the measure in which the
footnote is to be typeset is likely to be pretty narrow, users of
the side option are recommended also to use the ragged option, to
avoid ugly spacing and line breaks.
There is a further problem (apart from the occasional failure to
place the marginal note on the correct side of the page) in two-
sided documents: one would like `raggedness' to appear differently
in different margins (setting the left, rather than the right,
side ragged in the left margin). (The author would welcome
suggestions on means of addressing the problem.)
Original comment by Bil.K...@gmail.com
on 30 Sep 2007 at 4:00
Should be fixed in r51. Adding the `asymmetry' option to the `geometry' package
keeps the marginpars in the right side of the page, regardless of the
oneside/twoside
option.
Original comment by godbyk@gmail.com
on 16 May 2008 at 12:07
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
jason.ca...@gmail.com
on 26 Sep 2007 at 6:05