This version of initializing a child class is perfectly acceptable in Python 2.7.x; however, it will not work in Python 3.x. For Python 3.x, the initialization with super would look like the following:
super().__init__(title, isbn, price)
However, we can make our implementation universally acceptable (i.e. syntactically correct across all of Python's versions) by using the following syntax:
Book.__init__(self, title, isbn, price)
Any way of doing it is absolutely acceptable; it is just a matter of what the software is required to support. Just a note! Either way, great job with this implementation and correctly using super for Python 2.7.x.
https://github.com/MorneTer/pwp-capstones/blob/04fefad0f4be95b01417d24acbe8c23b5f400dee/Submit/TomeRater.py#L86-L88
This version of initializing a child class is perfectly acceptable in Python 2.7.x; however, it will not work in Python 3.x. For Python 3.x, the initialization with
superwould look like the following:super().__init__(title, isbn, price)However, we can make our implementation universally acceptable (i.e. syntactically correct across all of Python's versions) by using the following syntax:
Book.__init__(self, title, isbn, price)Any way of doing it is absolutely acceptable; it is just a matter of what the software is required to support. Just a note! Either way, great job with this implementation and correctly using
superfor Python 2.7.x.