Open Morningstar88 opened 5 months ago
My name is Jake Mackenzie, and I swear the following upon my soul, under penalty of perjury.
(1) The Guardian Newspaper negligently claimed there was a virus in the UK, Europe and the rest of the world. (2) They claimed that UK citizens, at home and abroad, should get vaccinated. (3) This caused pressure, arguments and resentment in my family for two years, as I have allergies to many modern vaccine ingredients, and declined to take the vaccine. (4) The Guardian's negligent, poorly fact checked claim caused loss of earnings in my teaching job, where I lost 80% of my earnings. (5) They also agreed with lockdowns, and denial of infrastructure to UK citizens at home and abroad. (6) I also believe they cooperate with Stephen Goedhart, Shepperton Studios, AMC and Heeren Loo to run illegal AR and VR simulations, without the consent of, or payment to, the participants. Refutation of these self-evident facts must be under Penalty of Perjury. Best Wishes.
Submit Claim - Confirmation Step 8 of 8
Your claim request has been accepted. The Defendant has 14 days from the date of service of the claim to reply.
Claim Submitted ClaimantMr Jake MackenzieDefendantGuardian News & MediaAmount paid£35.00Claim NumberL7QZ9D42Payment reference8052399389View Claim as PDFView Claim as Plain Text You need the Claim Number when contacting the court or Customer Help Desk.
You may print a PDF or plain text version of your Claim using the following options:
You can monitor your Claim request from the Claim Overview of Money Claim Online.
What the Guardian has to do.
Help with court fees
Dear Sir or Madam,
Thank you for your service. I hope you can assist me with an unchallenged claim.
I served a case against Guardian Media Group on 22ND JUNE 2024.
I received an acknowledgement of service from you to my home address.
The Guardian Media Group has not responded by the 7TH JULY Deadline.
I would like to ask you to Make a Judgement and/or order the Defendant to pay.
When I click through to my account, I cannot find claim number LZQ79D42. Only an empty draft claim form.
Can you help me fix this error? I would be grateful.
Sincerely,
Jake Mackenzie, Shepperton.
Step 1 of 8
Each step is completed by clicking 'Next' at the bottom of the page, which automatically confirms and saves the information you have entered. Any error messages displayed at the top of a page must be corrected before moving on to the next step.
Before you proceed with your request for judgment:
you must have received a full admission from the defendant(s) that they owe you the money claimed (see 'please note' below)
or
14 days must have expired since the claim was served on the defendant(s) (the claim is considered served on the fifth day after it was issued) and a response has not been filed or served on you
If you served separate detailed particulars of claim on the defendant(s), you must have filed a certificate of service within 14 days of serving these and, where you've done this, you must confirm this if you proceed to request judgment.
You don't have to pay a fee to enter judgment. A judgment order will be sent to the defendant(s). It is your responsibility to enforce the order if the defendant(s) does not comply with the terms.
If you experience any difficulties, contact the help desk:
Email: ccbc@justice.gov.uk
14 days must have expired since the claim was served on the defendant(s) (the claim is considered served on the fifth day after it was issued) and a response has not been filed or served on you
If you served separate detailed particulars of claim on the defendant(s), you must have filed a certificate of service within 14 days of serving these and, where you've done this, you must confirm this if you proceed to request judgment.
You don't have to pay a fee to enter judgment. A judgment order will be sent to the defendant(s). It is your responsibility to enforce the order if the defendant(s) does not comply with the terms.
Acknowledgment of Service Claim numberL7QZ9D42 ClaimantMr Jake Mackenzie DefendantGuardian News & Media
Defendant's full name if different from the name given on the claim form Guardian News & Media Limited
Address to which documents about this claim should be sent Guardian News & Media Limited Kings Place 90 York Way London N19GU
Additional contact details Telephone number020 3353 2943
Intention I intend to defend all of this claim
Signed I am the Defendant Joseph Andriano Senior Editorial Lawyer 10/07/2024
![Uploading image.png…]()
hi, how frequent is it for a defending corporation to ask a judge to strike out a claim against it? Copilot Sent by Copilot: Striking out a claim against a defending corporation can happen, although it’s not uncommon. Judges may consider striking out a claim if it lacks reasonable grounds, constitutes an abuse of the court process, or violates procedural rules1. Properly articulating the basis for a claim and following Civil Procedure requirements are crucial to avoid such outcomes. If a claimant misses a procedural step, their entire claim could be at risk of being struck out2. Keep in mind that each case is unique, and the frequency of strike-out requests can vary based on specific circumstances. 😊
Learn more
1
dekachambers.com 2
localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk 3
hallellis.co.uk 4
nechambers.co.uk 5
justice.gov.uk +2 more You Sent by you: thanks.. what is cpr 16 in the uk small claims system? Copilot Sent by Copilot: CPR 16 in the UK small claims system pertains to Statements of Case. Here are the key points:
Contents of the Claim Form (Rule 16.2): The claim form must: Contain a concise statement of the nature of the claim. Specify the remedy sought by the claimant. Include a statement of value (if claiming money). State the interest accrued (if claiming a specified sum). Address other matters as outlined in practice directions. If particulars of claim aren’t included with the form, the claimant must indicate that they will follow. If claiming in a representative capacity, this must be stated. Statement of Value (Rule 16.3): Applies when claiming money. The claimant must state: The amount claimed. The expected recovery: Not more than £10,000. More than £10,000 but not exceeding £25,000. More than £25,000 but not exceeding £100,000. More than £100,000. Alternatively, if uncertain about the likely recovery amount. Remember, these rules help ensure clarity and fairness in small claims proceedings. 😊12
Learn more
1
justice.gov.uk 2
uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com 3
judiciary.uk 4
assets.publishing.service.gov.uk +1 more You Sent by you: thanks.. what is cpr 3.4(2)a,b and c in the uk small claims system... Copilot Sent by Copilot: Certainly! Let’s break down CPR 3.4(2)(a), (b), and © in the UK small claims system:
CPR 3.4(2)(a): This rule deals with striking out a statement of case that discloses no reasonable grounds for bringing or defending a claim. Examples include: Cases with no facts indicating the claim’s nature (e.g., “Money owed £5000”). Incoherent statements that make no sense. Coherent facts that, even if true, don’t establish a legally recognizable claim against the defendant. CPR 3.4(2)(b): This rule addresses statements of case that are an abuse of the court’s process or likely to obstruct just disposal of proceedings. A claim may fall under this category if it’s vexatious, scurrilous, or obviously ill-founded. CPR 3.4(2)©: This provision relates to situations where: The claimant has been ordered to pay costs to the defendant. Before paying those costs, the claimant starts another claim against the same defendant based on the same or substantially similar facts as the previously struck-out claim123. Feel free to ask if you need further clarification! 😊
Corporate lawyers often rely on procedural rules to navigate legal proceedings effectively. These rules provide a framework for presenting cases, ensuring fairness, and maintaining order in court. While corporate lawyers are generally well-versed in procedures, they also recognize that many small claims claimants lack legal expertise.
Judges are aware of this disparity. They strive to balance the playing field by providing guidance, simplifying processes, and ensuring that claimants understand their rights. In small claims courts, judges often adopt a more accessible approach, recognizing that claimants may not have legal representation. Their goal is to facilitate a fair and just resolution while considering the claimants’ limitations.
If you have any more questions, feel free to ask! 😊
MAIN CASE
Thank you for presiding over this case.
I certainly do not wish to abuse any court process, as claimed by the defendant in 10(3.2).
I have never taken anyone to court before, and I am simply asking that this case is overseen by fair, impartial judges.
I'm claiming against the Guardian because their coverage contributed towards a worldwide panic which caused, health, travel, transport and social problems for many British citizens, at home or abroad.
The Guardian Newspaper wrote at least five articles claiming that:
There was a virus.
Lockdowns and vaccines were an appropriate response to this virus.
I believe that the Guardian Media Group's claim that there was a virus, was negligent, dangerous, biased,and poorly fact-checked.
The Guardian's coverage of the 'pandemic' contributed significantly to the hysteria in the UK.
Guardian articles promoted vaccines as a viable response to the virus.
When the vaccines were released, in 2021 and 2022, there was no care taken to ensure that there was an appropriate testing period, to guard against side-effects, toxins, and long term health effects.
The Guardian's promotion of vaccines was both reckless and biased.
This promotion of vaccines in the Guardian's coverage, amounts to medical coercion, where those who were unvaccinated, were asked to stay at home. MORE
The vaccines were rushed out, without a proper testing period. The Guardian knew this, chose to ignore the dangers, and put the health of many British citizens at risk, both in the UK, and abroad, as their periodical is read worldwide.
The Guardian's pushing of the COVID narrative contributed to worldwide lockdowns, where many people, including myself, lost significant income. My income in Taipei went from an average of 1000 pounds per month, to 300, as students were ordered to stay at home. The Guardian's pushing of the pharmaceutical narrative contributed directly to this situation.
My supervisor at work, Derek Rhodes, is a British citizen, and contributed to vax blaimalil. PROVE, screengrab.
I therefore believe the Guardian's coverage of the virus and vaccine to be negligent, psychologically hurtful, financially damaging to millions of livelihoods, and a contribution towards the violation of several basic human rights...
Human Rights Violated
The right to do business in a high street or shopping precinct without government or corporate interference. The Guardian's coverage contributed to worldwide lockdown hysteria in many expatriate communities, including the Taipei business community.
The right to travel on buses, trains, and aeroplanes without being coerced into taking dangerously untested vaccines, which could be harmful or fatal to human health. The Guardian promoted vaccine transport PROVE.
The right of the British Public, and myself, to have a testing period of 5-10 years, before vaccines were released. Under penalty of perjury, I saw several acquaintances and friends hit with dangerous side-effects from the vaccines. One twenty-six year old Taiwanese lady developed shaking in her hands soon after being vaccinated. Other friends complained of severe tiredness. I knew two people who developed Bell's Palsy. I had another friend who developed flu for months.
The Guardian, in times of peace and war, is under a very serious obligation to every UK citizen to fact check their claims, and act with integrity, calm and diligence. I believe they did not meet this obligation, and instead promoted unfounded medical hysteria, putting the lives, health, travel plans and savings of many UK citizens in jeopardy.
In short, The Guardian took part in a prolonged national blackmail scheme, in which dangerous, untested vaccines were forced upon British citizens, at home and abroad, by multiple South East Asian governments.
It was made clear, in multiple Guardian articles, that those who did not take the vaccine would not have access to infrastructure. PROVE.
The Guardian's articles, biased towards pharmaceutical narratives, was a direct contributor to myself, and others losing access to our jobs, public spaces, free-will to make health decisions, and international transport.
I have laid out my case, as best I can, and I ask the courts of Katherine House to find against them.
*
TWO: STEPHEN GOEDHART
Regarding the Stephen Goedhart claim, I understand, your honour, that this is a fairly hard to prove claim.
I will be content if the Guardian would sign an affidavit, under penalty of perjury, that they have never done business with Mr Stephen Goedhart, nor acted under his influence. Nor have they participated in any AR or VR simulations run
I enclose the form.
*
I understand that the court will want to judge each case separately.
I believe I have every right to seek legal remedy, and a sworn statement from The Guardian.
If the Guardian are honest, and clear of conscience, they can sign the form and return it within a few minutes.
*
SUMMARY
I too seek a speedy resolution to this case.
I do not need a face to face trial either. I am not presently in the UK, and don't have a 100% reliable internet connection.
I would prefer that this case is judged, 100% online, by a judge,.
I am simply asking, that an honest and fair judge look at the case, and make a decision. I do not believe, as the Guardian claims, that I have abused any court procedure. In fact, it is my strong belief the Guardian newspaper abused the goodwill, credulity and decency of the British public, acting as they did, in the service of medical profits, hysteria, restriction of freedom of movement, and business. CLARIFY.
I have done my best, as a layman, to follow procedure.
I have done my best to present a clear, concise case, to the best of my ability.
I await the response from the court, and perhaps the Guardian legal team.
Yours Faithfully,
Jake Mackenzie
The centre of gravity of strike out applications is conduct that deprives a party of a fair trial.
It can also deprive a party of a substantive legal right.
It's a harsh remedy and usually applied in extreme cases.
MEDIMAIN - MEDIATIONMAIN
Dear Moneyclaim, and St Katharine's House,
I hope you are well this July morning. My name is Jake Mackenzie, writing to you regarding case number L7QZ9D42
MACKENZIE Vs GUARDIAN NEWS AND MEDIA LIMITED
I received Mr Adriano's letter on the 25th of July.
My response is as follows.
I certainly do not wish to abuse or obstruct any court process, as claimed by GMN and Mr Adriano, in 10(3.2) of their response.
I have never taken anyone to court before, and I am simply asking that this case be overseen by fair, impartial judges or mediators in St Katharine's House.
I wish only to recover money from the Guardian to start to cover the professional and financial damages I have incurred during the COVID episode. I did not ask for a higher amount, because I did not have more than 35 pounds to pay the court fee. My case is a very serious claim, for significant damages, and I see it as neither abusive nor frivolous.
I was previously a long time reader of The Guardian, since my teenage years. I found their actions from 2020 to 2023 to be disappointing, damaging, and dangerous. I lost work, business and money as a direct result of their negligence. I will make a short case in this letter. I am preparing a much longer slideshow right now.
Like the defendant, The Guardian, I seek a speedy resolution, without trial if possible.
I am open to mediation with a Moneyclaim Court officer, as long as I get a financial settlement which reflects both damages incurred, and the time I have spent compiling this case.
My tort is as follows:
I lost nearly two to three years worth of income as an English teacher in Taipei, as a direct result of COVID vaccine and lockdown regulations. Regulations which were promoted and supported by The Guardian. I can prove both a loss of earnings, and a healthy income prior to 2020, with screengrabbed emails and payslips.
My loss of earnings occurred because students were not allowed to come to class for a period lasting at least 18 months. Along with this, unvaccinated teachers were treated as second class citizens, and told to stay at home for even longer than those who chose to vaccinate. I have screen grabbed emails from my supervisor, Derek Rhodes of Kent, to prove all of this. As I have allergies to many modern medical ingredients, including penicillin, MSG and gluten, I was very worried about possible permanent damage or injury from barely tested vaccines. I saw friends suffer from Bell's Palsy, chronic fatigue, and uncontrollable shaking soon after being vaccinated. Thus, I stayed at home for most of 2020, to 2022, and lost a lot of money, due to inability to go into the office, and work. Work and travel are all basic human rights.
The virus and vaccine hysteria was disproportionate, void of sound medical logic, and potentially highly lucrative for many pharmaceutical companies. The Guardian of London, for a period of two to three years, was abjectly complicit in the hysteria and hype surrounding both the virus and vaccine solution.
They showed themselves to be:
I am currently compiling an annotated slideshow, showing the Guardian's articles during this period. An unfinished draft is readable here:
https://github.com/Morningstar88/Guardian-UK-COVID/blob/main/README.md
There is therefore, a direct cause of action between three clear sets of facts :
The exaggerated and potentially baseless coverage of the 'virus' provided by the Guardian of London.
The lockdowns and virus regulations implemented by both the Taipei government, and the Taiwan business community. Many expatriates abroad are overseas readers of The Guardian. The lockdowns and regulations were a result of alarmist pandemic reporting from the Guardian, and other Western periodicals. If the Guardian contributed to the virus and vaccine, they are complicit, and responsible for their error. I can prove all this with screengrabbed Guardian articles.
Our previously healthy and popular language school, Core Corner of Zhongxiao Fuxing, lost a significant amount of money and students, due to Ministry of Education regulations, and decisions taken by supervisors. The Guardian is responsible for promoting the virus, and therefore, as adults of legal age, responsible for the consequences of their reporting.
CAUSE OF ACTION: I lost money during COVID lockdowns, as a result of hysterical virus coverage from the British press, including The Guardian. I am therefore claiming a monetary settlement.
Mr Adriano's strike out order, while bravely and beautifully written, is dismissive of the simple logic of my case, the negative events I have suffered, and the duty of care the London Guardian owes to the people of The United Kingdom.
I therefore, in the name of The King of England, request that a mediator be appointed, and we resolve this case, online, outside court, with vigor and alacrity.
If the Guardian were to reconsider their stance, I may offer the following resolution;
regarding Mr Stephen Goedhart
I am certainly willing to negotiate terms, if Mr Adriano would
I would like to remind the Guardian Media Group, that very real people, with very real lives, and very real businesses, have been permanently affected both medically, and . contemptous and disdainful. 1,2,3
If not, I am happy to go to hearing, as I feel I have a strong case. Pfizer are already being sued etc..
In summary
Please tell me what steps I need to take next to bring a swift end to this process.
Faithfully,
Jake Mackenzie
TODO - find all emails. rewrite 2-3 times. compile to PDF. ask for email only, cos rural cambodia.
Certainly! A tort is a civil wrong that occurs when a person or company (referred to as a tortfeasor) violates someone’s legal rights, other than by breaching a contract. Under tort law, the tortfeasor can be held liable for that violation. Tort liability arises in various ways, including the following:
Negligence: This is quite common. Negligence occurs when a tortfeasor harms someone by failing to fulfill a legal duty to act with the required level of care. To establish negligence, a victim must show: The tortfeasor had a duty to them (e.g., a doctor’s duty to provide professional care or a driver’s duty to exercise safe behavior). The tortfeasor failed to live up to this duty (i.e., was negligent). The victim suffered damages directly due to the tortfeasor’s breach of duty. In civil court, tort liability aims to compensate victims rather than imposing criminal penalties. If a court finds a defendant liable under tort laws, they are required to compensate the victim1. If you have further questions or need additional information, feel free to ask! 😊
Certainly! Here are examples of how you can use “tort” and “tortious” in sentences:
Tort: “The injured pedestrian filed a lawsuit against the reckless driver, claiming that their negligence caused the accident.” “The company was found liable for the toxic waste spill, and the affected residents sought compensation for the environmental damage under tort law.” Tortious: “The employee’s tortious interference with the contract led to the cancellation of the business deal.” “The competitor’s false advertising campaign was deemed tortious, as it harmed the reputation of our product.” Feel free to ask if you need more examples or have any other questions! 😊
Certainly! Here are some simple sentences using the term “tort”:
“The slip-and-fall accident in the grocery store resulted in a tort claim against the store owner.” “The neighbor’s dog bit me, and I considered filing a tort lawsuit for personal injury.” “The company faced a tort case after their defective product caused harm to consumers.” “Her reputation was damaged by the false rumors spread online, leading to a defamation tort.” “The negligent driver caused a car crash, and the injured passengers sought compensation through tort law.” Feel free to ask if you need more examples or have any other questions! 😊
The UK press played a crucial role during the COVID-19 pandemic, but their duty of care primarily extends to providing accurate and reliable information. Here are some points to consider:
Duty of Care:
Research on Vaccines:
Balancing Information:
Public Trust:
In summary, while the press isn't directly responsible for vaccine research, they play a critical role in disseminating accurate information. Responsible reporting contributes to informed decision-making and public health outcomes¹². 😊
Source: Conversation with Copilot, 7/29/2024 (1) Home | UK Covid Vaccine Research Hub. https://www.covidvaccineresearch.org/. (2) The COVID vaccine mandate in English care homes led to fewer staff .... https://theconversation.com/the-covid-vaccine-mandate-in-english-care-homes-led-to-fewer-staff-and-may-not-have-reduced-resident-deaths-203201. (3) Consultation launched on staff COVID-19 vaccines in care homes ... - GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/consultation-launched-on-staff-covid-19-vaccines-in-care-homes-with-older-adult-residents. (4) Public decisions about COVID-19 vaccines: A UK-based qualitative ... - PLOS. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0277360. (5) New research reinforces the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-research-reinforces-the-efficacy-of-covid-19-vaccines.
Certainly! When a court makes an order on its own initiative (without a hearing), parties affected by that order have the right to apply for it to be set aside, varied, or stayed. Here are the three options:
Set Aside: A party can apply to have the order completely set aside. This means the order would no longer be in effect.
Varied: Alternatively, a party can seek to vary the order. This involves modifying specific aspects of the order while keeping it in force.
Stayed: A party may request that the order be stayed, which means temporarily suspending its enforcement or implementation.
Remember that this application is not for relief from sanctions and follows specific rules under CPR r.3.3 (5) (a) ¹. If you need further clarification or have additional questions, feel free to ask! 😊
Source: Conversation with Copilot, 7/29/2024 (1) Setting Aside, or Varying an Order made on the Court's - 33 Bedford Row. https://www.33bedfordrow.co.uk/insights/bulletins/setting-aside-or-varying-an-order-made-on-the-courts-own-initiative-without-a-hearing. (2) Setting aside judgment for non-attendance: not necessarily what you may .... https://gatehouselaw.co.uk/setting-aside-judgment-for-non-attendance-not-necessarily-what-you-may-expect/. (3) A guide to setting aside default judgment - Wright Hassall. https://www.wrighthassall.co.uk/knowledge-base/a-guide-to-setting-aside-default-judgment. (4) Strike out, summary judgment, and setting aside default judgment. https://www.bindmans.com/knowledge-hub/blogs/dispute-resolution-guides-part-three/.
MEDIMAIN - MEDIATIONMAIN
Dear Moneyclaim, and St Katharine's House,
I hope you are well this July morning. My name is Jake Mackenzie, writing to you regarding case number L7QZ9D42
MACKENZIE Vs GUARDIAN NEWS AND MEDIA LIMITED
I received Mr Adriano's letter on the 25th of July.
My response is as follows.
I certainly do not wish to abuse or obstruct any court process, as claimed by GMN and Mr Adriano, in 10(3.2) of their response.
I have never taken anyone to court before, and I am simply asking that this case be overseen by fair, impartial judges or mediators in St Katharine's House.
I wish only to recover money from the Guardian to start to cover the professional and financial damages I have incurred during the COVID episode. I did not ask for a higher amount, because I did not have more than 35 pounds to pay the court fee. My case is a very serious claim, for significant damages, and I see it as neither abusive nor frivolous.
I was previously a long time reader of The Guardian, since my teenage years. I found their actions from 2020 to 2023 to be disappointing, damaging, and dangerous. I lost work, business and money as a direct result of their negligence. I will make a short case in this letter. I am preparing a much longer slideshow right now.
Mediation is Requested
Like the defendant, The Guardian, I seek a speedy resolution, without trial if possible.
I am open to mediation with a Moneyclaim Court officer, as long as I get a financial settlement which reflects both damages incurred, and the time I have spent compiling this case.
My tort is as follows:
- I lost nearly two to three years worth of income as an English teacher in Taipei, as a direct result of COVID vaccine and lockdown regulations. Regulations which were promoted and supported by The Guardian. I can prove both a loss of earnings, and a healthy income prior to 2020, with screengrabbed emails and payslips.
- My loss of earnings occurred because students were not allowed to come to class for a period lasting at least 18 months. Along with this, unvaccinated teachers were treated as second class citizens, and told to stay at home for even longer than those who chose to vaccinate. I have screen grabbed emails from my supervisor, Derek Rhodes of Kent, to prove all of this. As I have allergies to many modern medical ingredients, including penicillin, MSG and gluten, I was very worried about possible permanent damage or injury from barely tested vaccines. I saw friends suffer from Bell's Palsy, chronic fatigue, and uncontrollable shaking soon after being vaccinated. Thus, I stayed at home for most of 2020, to 2022, and lost a lot of money, due to inability to go into the office, and work. Work and travel are all basic human rights.
- The virus and vaccine hysteria was disproportionate, void of sound medical logic, and potentially highly lucrative for many pharmaceutical companies. The Guardian of London, for a period of two to three years, was abjectly complicit in the hysteria and hype surrounding both the virus and vaccine solution.
They showed themselves to be:
- Dismissive towards vaccine side effects, QUOTE
- Supportive of 'brutal but effective' lockdown practices,
- They also released articles composed of incoherent medical logic and spurious statistics.
I am currently compiling an annotated slideshow, showing the Guardian's articles during this period. An unfinished draft is readable here:
https://github.com/Morningstar88/Guardian-UK-COVID/blob/main/README.md
There is therefore, a direct cause of action between three clear sets of facts :
- The exaggerated and potentially baseless coverage of the 'virus' provided by the Guardian of London.
- The lockdowns and virus regulations implemented by both the Taipei government, and the Taiwan business community. Many expatriates abroad are overseas readers of The Guardian. The lockdowns and regulations were a result of alarmist pandemic reporting from the Guardian, and other Western periodicals. If the Guardian contributed to the virus and vaccine, they are complicit, and responsible for their error. I can prove all this with screengrabbed Guardian articles.
- Our previously healthy and popular language school, Core Corner of Zhongxiao Fuxing, lost a significant amount of money and students, due to Ministry of Education regulations, and decisions taken by supervisors. The Guardian is responsible for promoting the virus, and therefore, as adults of legal age, responsible for the consequences of their reporting.
CAUSE OF ACTION: I lost money during COVID lockdowns, as a result of hysterical virus coverage from the British press, including The Guardian. I am therefore claiming a monetary settlement.
Mr Adriano's strike out order, while bravely and beautifully written, is dismissive of the simple logic of my case, the negative events I have suffered, and the duty of care the London Guardian owes to the people of The United Kingdom.
I therefore, in the name of The King of England, request that a mediator be appointed, and we resolve this case, online, outside court, with vigor and alacrity.
If the Guardian were to reconsider their stance, I may offer the following resolution;
- I will not speak publicly about any amount of money I have received from them.
regarding Mr Stephen Goedhart
I am certainly willing to negotiate terms, if Mr Adriano would
I would like to remind the Guardian Media Group, that very real people, with very real lives, and very real businesses, have been permanently affected both medically, and . contemptous and disdainful. 1,2,3
If not, I am happy to go to hearing, as I feel I have a strong case. Pfizer are already being sued etc..
In summary
Please tell me what steps I need to take next to bring a swift end to this process.
Faithfully,
Jake Mackenzie
TODO - find all emails. rewrite 2-3 times. compile to PDF. ask for email only, cos rural cambodia.
MEDIMAINNEW
FAO: legal@theguardian.com, CNBC@justice.gov.uk, jospeh.adriano@theguardian.com, ClaimResponses.CNBC.gov.uk, AOS.CNBC@justice.gov.uk
SUBJECT: Jake Mackenzie response, case L7QZ9D42
Dear Moneyclaim, and St Katharine's House,
I hope you are well this summer morning. My name is Jake Mackenzie, writing to you regarding case number L7QZ9D42
I received Mr Adriano's letter on the 25th of July.
My response is as follows.
I certainly do not wish to abuse or obstruct any court process, as claimed by GMN and Mr Adriano, in 10(3.2) of their response.
I have never taken anyone to court before, and I am simply asking that this case be overseen by fair, impartial judges or mediators in St Katharine's House.
I wish only to recover money from the Guardian to start to cover the professional and financial damages I have incurred during the COVID episode. I did not ask for a higher amount, because I did not have more than 35 pounds to pay the court fee. My case is a very serious claim, for significant damages, and I see it as neither abusive nor frivolous.
I was previously a long time reader of The Guardian, since my teenage years. I found their actions from 2020 to 2023 to be disappointing, damaging, and dangerous. I lost work, business and money as a direct result of their negligence. I will make a short case in this letter. I am preparing a much longer slideshow right now.
Like the defendant, The Guardian, I seek a speedy resolution, without trial if possible.
I am open to mediation with a Moneyclaim Court officer, as long as I get a financial settlement which reflects both damages incurred, and the time I have spent compiling this case.
My tort is as follows:
The virus and vaccine hysteria was disproportionate, void of sound medical logic, and potentially highly lucrative for many pharmaceutical companies. The Guardian of London, for a period of two to three years, was abjectly complicit in the hysteria and hype surrounding both the virus and vaccine solution.
They showed themselves to be:
I am currently compiling an annotated slideshow, showing the Guardian's articles during this period. An unfinished draft is readable here:
https://github.com/Morningstar88/Guardian-UK-COVID/blob/main/README.md
There is therefore, a direct cause of action between three clear sets of events.
1 - The exaggerated and potentially baseless coverage of the 'virus' provided by the Guardian of London.
2 - The lockdowns and virus regulations implemented by both the Taipei government, and the Taiwan business community. Many expatriates abroad are overseas readers of The Guardian. The lockdowns and regulations were a result of alarmist pandemic reporting from the Guardian, and other Western periodicals. If the Guardian contributed to the virus and vaccine, they are complicit, and responsible for their error. I can prove all this with screengrabbed Guardian articles.
3 - Our previously healthy and popular language school, Core Corner of Zhongxiao Fuxing, lost a significant amount of money and students, due to Ministry of Education regulations, and decisions taken by supervisors. The Guardian is responsible for promoting the virus, and therefore, as adults of legal age, responsible for the consequences of their reporting.
CAUSE OF ACTION: I lost money during COVID lockdowns, as a result of hysterical virus coverage from the British press, including The Guardian. I am therefore claiming a monetary settlement.
Mr Adriano's strike-out order, while bravely and beautifully written, is dismissive of the simple logic of my case, the negative events I have suffered, and the duty of care the London Guardian owes to the people of The United Kingdom.
I therefore, in the name of The King of England, request that a mediator be appointed, and we resolve this case, online, outside court, with vigor and alacrity.
If the Guardian were to reconsider their stance, I may offer the following resolution;
I will not speak publicly about any amount of money I have received from them. I will simply say I received a settlement from a newspaper for an undisclosed sum.
I am now asking for 300 pounds, plus 300 pounds costs, as preparing the case since Joseph Adriano's response pack has cost me 20 hours, a significant amount of my time.
I am certainly willing to negotiate terms, if Mr Adriano and his client would offer something from their side.
I would like to remind the Guardian Media Group, that very real people, with very real lives, and very real businesses, have been permanently affected both medically, by the COVID debacle. I do not think they can claimto be neutral reporters of the facts any longer, as their coverage shows a clear bias.
If Mr Adriano and his team are not amenable to a quick resolution, I am happy to go to hearing, as I feel I have a strong case. Pfizer are already being sued in the United States, in some ongoing cases.
In summary I believe the Guardian of London owes me damages for their actions during COVID.
Please tell me what steps I need to take next to bring a swift end to this process. I would appreciate an acknowledgement of this email.
Faithfully,
Jake Mackenzie
MEDIMAINNEW
FAO: legal@theguardian.com, CNBC@justice.gov.uk, jospeh.adriano@theguardian.com, ClaimResponses.CNBC.gov.uk, AOS.CNBC@justice.gov.uk
SUBJECT: Jake Mackenzie response to Guardian Media Group, case L7QZ9D42
Dear Moneyclaim, and St Katharine's House,
I hope you are well this summer morning. My name is Jake Mackenzie, writing to you regarding case number L7QZ9D42
I received Mr Adriano's letter on the 25th of July.
My response is as follows.
I certainly do not wish to abuse or obstruct any court process, as claimed by GMN and Mr Adriano, in 10(3.2) of their response.
I have never taken anyone to court before, and I am simply asking that this case be overseen by fair, impartial judges or mediators in St Katharine's House.
I wish only to recover money from the Guardian to start to cover the professional and financial damages I have incurred during the COVID episode. I did not ask for a higher amount, because I did not have more than 35 pounds to pay the court fee.
I was previously a long time reader of The Guardian, since my teenage years. I found their actions from 2020 to 2023 to be disappointing, damaging, and dangerous. I lost work, business and money as a direct result of their negligence. I will make a short case in this letter. I am preparing a much longer slideshow right now.
Like the defendant, The Guardian, I seek a speedy resolution, without trial if possible.
I am open to mediation with a Moneyclaim Court officer, as long as I get a financial settlement which reflects both damages incurred, and the time I have spent compiling this case.
My tort is as follows:
The Guardian:
I am currently compiling an annotated slideshow, showing the Guardian's articles during this period. An unfinished draft is readable here:
https://github.com/Morningstar88/Guardian-UK-COVID/blob/main/README.md
There is, in my case, a direct cause of action between three clear sets of events.
1 - The exaggerated and potentially baseless coverage of the 'virus' provided by the Guardian of London.
2 - The lockdowns and virus regulations implemented by both the Taipei government, and the Taiwan business community. Many expatriates abroad are overseas readers of The Guardian. The lockdowns and regulations were a result of alarmist pandemic reporting from the Guardian, and other Western periodicals. If the Guardian contributed to the virus and vaccine, they are complicit, and responsible for their error. I can prove all this with screengrabbed Guardian articles.
3 - Our previously healthy and popular language school, Core Corner of Zhongxiao Fuxing, lost a significant amount of money and students, due to Ministry of Education regulations, and decisions taken by supervisors. The Guardian is responsible for promoting the virus, and therefore, as adults of legal age, responsible for the consequences of their reporting.
CAUSE OF ACTION: I lost money during COVID lockdowns, as a result of hysterical virus coverage from the British press, including The Guardian. I am therefore claiming a monetary settlement.
Mr Adriano's strike-out order, while bravely and beautifully written, is dismissive of the simple logic of my case, the negative events I have suffered, and the duty of care the London Guardian owes to the people of The United Kingdom.
I therefore, in the name of The King of England, request that a mediator be appointed, and we resolve this case, online, outside court, with vigor and alacrity.
If the Guardian were to reconsider their stance, I may offer the following resolution;
I will not speak publicly about any amount of money I have received from them. I will simply say I received a settlement from a newspaper for an undisclosed sum.
I am now asking for 300 pounds, plus 300 pounds costs, as preparing the case since Joseph Adriano's response pack has cost me 20 hours, a significant amount of my time.
I am willing to negotiate terms, if Mr Adriano and his client would offer something from their side.
Regarding Stepehn Goedhart and AMC, we can deal with that in a separate letter. I would be happy if the Guardian simply signed an affidavit conforming they have never cooperated with such persons.
I would like to remind the Guardian Media Group, that very real people, with very real lives, and very real businesses, have been permanently affected both medically and financially, by the COVID debacle. I do not think they can claim to be neutral reporters of the facts any longer, as their coverage shows a clear bias.
If Mr Adriano and his team are not amenable to a quick resolution, I am happy to go to hearing, as I feel I have a strong case. Pfizer are already being sued in the United States, in some ongoing cases.
In summary, I believe the Guardian of London owes me damages for their actions during COVID.
Please tell me what steps I need to take next to bring a swift end to this process. I would appreciate an acknowledgement of this email.
Thank you for taking the time to read this.
Faithfully,
Jake Mackenzie
SUBJECT: Jake Mackenzie response to Guardian Media Group, case L7QZ9D42
legal@theguardian.com, CNBC@justice.gov.uk, jospeh.adriano@theguardian.com, ClaimResponses.CNBC@justice.gov.uk, AOS.CNBC@justice.gov.uk
在 Khmer 的皇宫里 (在 Angkor Thom)
一位俊俏的 宫女 (一位漂亮的宫女) 偷偷地来到 King Jayavarman VII 的寝宫 (King Jayavarman VII's bedchambers), 她知道 King Jayavarman VII 正在等待她的到来。
King Jayavarman VII 看到她走进来,他的眼睛闪烁...
在 Khmer 的皇宫里 (在 Angkor Thom)
一位俊俏的 宫女 (一位漂亮的宫女) 偷偷地来到 King Jayavarman VII 的寝宫 (King Jayavarman VII's bedchambers), 她知道 King Jayavarman VII 正在等待她的到来。
King Jayavarman VII 看到她走进来,他的眼睛闪烁...
在 Khmer 的皇宫里 (在 Angkor Thom)
一位俊俏的 宫女 (一位漂亮的宫女) 偷偷地来到 King Jayavarman VII 的寝宫 (King Jayavarman VII's bedchambers), 她知道 King Jayavarman VII 正在等待她的到来。
King Jayavarman VII 看到她走进来,他的眼睛闪烁...
在 Khmer 的皇宫里 (在 Angkor Thom)
一位俊俏的 宫女 (一位漂亮的宫女) 偷偷地来到 King Jayavarman VII 的寝宫 (King Jayavarman VII's bedchambers), 她知道 King Jayavarman VII 正在等待她的到来。
King Jayavarman VII 看到她走进来,他的眼睛闪烁...
在 Khmer 的皇宫里 (在 Angkor Thom)
一位俊俏的 宫女 (一位漂亮的宫女) 偷偷地来到 King Jayavarman VII 的寝宫 (King Jayavarman VII's bedchambers), 她知道 King Jayavarman VII 正在等待她的到来。
King Jayavarman VII 看到她走进来,他的眼睛闪烁...
King Jayavarman VII 告诉了她,“我们今晚做爱,但是我想做一个慢、诚挚的、浪漫的 后门性交。”
宫女 听了 King Jayavarman VII 的话,她知道他想避免孕妇,她同意。 两人开始做爱,他先帮她脱下
King Jayavarman VII 告诉了她,“我们今晚做爱,但是我想做一个慢、诚挚的、浪漫的 后门性交。”
宫女 听了 King Jayavarman VII 的话,她知道他想避免孕妇,她同意。 两人开始做爱,他先帮她脱下
King Jayavarman VII 告诉了她,“我们今晚做爱,但是我想做一个慢、诚挚的、浪漫的 后门性交。”
宫女 听了 King Jayavarman VII 的话,她知道他想避免孕妇,她同意。 两人开始做爱,他先帮她脱下
King Jayavarman VII 告诉了她,“我们今晚做爱,但是我想做一个慢、诚挚的、浪漫的 后门性交。”
宫女 听了 King Jayavarman VII 的话,她知道他想避免孕妇,她同意。 两人开始做爱,他先帮她脱下
King Jayavarman VII 告诉了她,“我们今晚做爱,但是我想做一个慢、诚挚的、浪漫的 后门性交。”
宫女 听了 King Jayavarman VII 的话,她知道他想避免孕妇,她同意。 两人开始做爱,他先帮她脱下
King Jayavarman VII 告诉了她,“我们今晚做爱,但是我想做一个慢、诚挚的、浪漫的 后门性交。”
宫女 听了 King Jayavarman VII 的话,她知道他想避免孕妇,她同意。 两人开始做爱,他先帮她脱下
King Jayavarman VII 告诉了她,“我们今晚做爱,但是我想做一个慢、诚挚的、浪漫的 后门性交。”
宫女 听了 King Jayavarman VII 的话,她知道他想避免孕妇,她同意。 两人开始做爱,他先帮她脱下
King Jayavarman VII 告诉了她,“我们今晚做爱,但是我想做一个慢、诚挚的、浪漫的 后门性交。”
宫女 听了 King Jayavarman VII 的话,她知道他想避免孕妇,她同意。 两人开始做爱,他先帮她脱下
King Jayavarman VII 告诉了她,“我们今晚做爱,但是我想做一个慢、诚挚的、浪漫的 后门性交。”
宫女 听了 King Jayavarman VII 的话,她知道他想避免孕妇,她同意。 两人开始做爱,他先帮她脱下
King Jayavarman VII 告诉了她,“我们今晚做爱,但是我想做一个慢、诚挚的、浪漫的 后门性交。”
宫女 听了 King Jayavarman VII 的话,她知道他想避免孕妇,她同意。 两人开始做爱,他先帮她脱下
King Jayavarman VII 告诉了她,“我们今晚做爱,但是我想做一个慢、诚挚的、浪漫的 后门性交。”
宫女 听了 King Jayavarman VII 的话,她知道他想避免孕妇,她同意。 两人开始做爱,他先帮她脱下
King Jayavarman VII 告诉了她,“我们今晚做爱,但是我想做一个慢、诚挚的、浪漫的 后门性交。”
宫女 听了 King Jayavarman VII 的话,她知道他想避免孕妇,她同意。 两人开始做爱,他先帮她脱下
King Jayavarman VII 告诉了她,“我们今晚做爱,但是我想做一个慢、诚挚的、浪漫的 后门性交。”
宫女 听了 King Jayavarman VII 的话,她知道他想避免孕妇,她同意。 两人开始做爱,他先帮她脱下
Phrases with “随机” (suíjī) 随机抽样 (suíjī chōuyàng) - Random sampling 随机应变 (suíjī yìngbiàn) - Adapt to changes (improvise) 随机分配 (suíjī fēnpèi) - Random allocation Engineering Terms 工程设计 (gōngchéng shèjì) - Engineering design
技术规范 (jìshù guīfàn) - Technical specifications
结构分析 (jiégòu fēnxī) - Structural analysis
追星族 (zhuīxīng zú) - Fans (especially of celebrities)
网络红人 (wǎngluò hóngrén) - Internet celebrity
潮流趋势 (cháoliú qūshì) - Trend
當我一個人在家的時候,我應該練習中文。也許鬼魂會聽到。當我一個人在家的時候,我應該練習中文。也許鬼魂會聽到。當我一個人在家的時候,我應該練習中文。也許鬼魂會聽到。當我一個人在家的時候,我應該練習中文。也許鬼魂會聽到。當我一個人在家的時候,我應該練習中文。也許鬼魂會聽到。當我一個人在家的時候,我應該練習中文。也許鬼魂會聽到。當我一個人在家的時候,我應該練習中文。也許鬼魂會聽到。當我一個人在家的時候,我應該練習中文。也許鬼魂會聽到。
Phrases with “随机” (suíjī) 随机抽样 (suíjī chōuyàng) - Random sampling 随机应变 (suíjī yìngbiàn) - Adapt to changes (improvise) 随机分配 (suíjī fēnpèi) - Random allocation Engineering Terms 工程设计 (gōngchéng shèjì) - Engineering design
技术规范 (jìshù guīfàn) - Technical specifications
结构分析 (jiégòu fēnxī) - Structural analysis
追星族 (zhuīxīng zú) - Fans (especially of celebrities)
网络红人 (wǎngluò hóngrén) - Internet celebrity
潮流趋势 (cháoliú qūshì) - Trend
Phrases with “随机” (suíjī) 随机抽样 (suíjī chōuyàng) - Random sampling 随机应变 (suíjī yìngbiàn) - Adapt to changes (improvise) 随机分配 (suíjī fēnpèi) - Random allocation Engineering Terms 工程设计 (gōngchéng shèjì) - Engineering design
技术规范 (jìshù guīfàn) - Technical specifications
结构分析 (jiégòu fēnxī) - Structural analysis
追星族 (zhuīxīng zú) - Fans (especially of celebrities)
网络红人 (wǎngluò hóngrén) - Internet celebrity
潮流趋势 (cháoliú qūshì) - Trend
Phrases with “随机” (suíjī) 随机抽样 (suíjī chōuyàng) - Random sampling 随机应变 (suíjī yìngbiàn) - Adapt to changes (improvise) 随机分配 (suíjī fēnpèi) - Random allocation Engineering Terms 工程设计 (gōngchéng shèjì) - Engineering design
技术规范 (jìshù guīfàn) - Technical specifications
结构分析 (jiégòu fēnxī) - Structural analysis
追星族 (zhuīxīng zú) - Fans (especially of celebrities)
网络红人 (wǎngluò hóngrén) - Internet celebrity
潮流趋势 (cháoliú qūshì) - Trend
Phrases with “随机” (suíjī) 随机抽样 (suíjī chōuyàng) - Random sampling 随机应变 (suíjī yìngbiàn) - Adapt to changes (improvise) 随机分配 (suíjī fēnpèi) - Random allocation Engineering Terms 工程设计 (gōngchéng shèjì) - Engineering design
技术规范 (jìshù guīfàn) - Technical specifications
结构分析 (jiégòu fēnxī) - Structural analysis
追星族 (zhuīxīng zú) - Fans (especially of celebrities)
网络红人 (wǎngluò hóngrén) - Internet celebrity
潮流趋势 (cháoliú qūshì) - Trend
King Jayavarman VII 告诉了她,“我们今晚做爱,但是我想做一个慢、诚挚的、浪漫的 后门性交。”
宫女 听了 King Jayavarman VII 的话,她知道他想避免孕妇,她同意。 两人开始做爱,他先帮她脱下
King Jayavarman VII 告诉了她,“我们今晚做爱,但是我想做一个慢、诚挚的、浪漫的 后门性交。”
宫女 听了 King Jayavarman VII 的话,她知道他想避免孕妇,她同意。 两人开始做爱,他先帮她脱下
King Jayavarman VII 告诉了她,“我们今晚做爱,但是我想做一个慢、诚挚的、浪漫的 后门性交。”
宫女 听了 King Jayavarman VII 的话,她知道他想避免孕妇,她同意。 两人开始做爱,他先帮她脱下
King Jayavarman VII 告诉了她,“我们今晚做爱,但是我想做一个慢、诚挚的、浪漫的 后门性交。”
宫女 听了 King Jayavarman VII 的话,她知道他想避免孕妇,她同意。 两人开始做爱,他先帮她脱下
King Jayavarman VII 告诉了她,“我们今晚做爱,但是我想做一个慢、诚挚的、浪漫的 后门性交。”
當我一個人在家的時候,我應該練習中文。也許鬼魂會聽到。當我一個人在家的時候,我應該練習中文。也許鬼魂會聽到。當我一個人在家的時候,我應該練習中文。也許鬼魂會聽到。當我一個人在家的時候,我應該練習中文。也許鬼魂會聽到。當我一個人在家的時候,我應該練習中文。也許鬼魂會聽到。當我一個人在家的時候,我應該練習中文。也許鬼魂會聽到。當我一個人在家的時候,我應該練習中文。也許鬼魂會聽到。當我一個人在家的時候,我應該練習中文。也許鬼魂會聽到。當我一個人在家的時候,我應該練習中文。也許鬼魂會聽到。當我一個人在家的時候,我應該練習中文。也許鬼魂會聽到。當我一個人在家的時候,我應該練習中文。也許鬼魂會聽到。
宫女 听了 King Jayavarman VII 的话,她知道他想避免孕妇,她同意。 两人开始做爱,他先帮她脱下
King Jayavarman VII 告诉了她,“我们今晚做爱,但是我想做一个慢、诚挚的、浪漫的 后门性交。”
宫女 听了 King Jayavarman VII 的话,她知道他想避免孕妇,她同意。 两人开始做爱,他先帮她脱下
As King Jayavarman VII slowly entered her from behind, the maid felt a mix of sensations. The initial penetration was gentle but firm, allowing her body to adjust to his presence. She felt a deep intimacy as he held her close, his breath warm against her neck.
With each deliberate thrust, he took his time, savoring the moment and the connection between them. The maid could feel the care and respect he had for her body, as he focused on her pleasure more than his
As King Jayavarman VII slowly entered her from behind, the maid felt a mix of sensations. The initial penetration was gentle but firm, allowing her body to adjust to his presence. She felt a deep intimacy as he held her close, his breath warm against her neck.
With each deliberate thrust, he took his time, savoring the moment and the connection between them. The maid could feel the care and respect he had for her body, as he focused on her pleasure more than his
Automatic reply: Jake Mackenzie, case number L7QZ9D42, requesting Mediation from Staines County Court This is an automatic acknowledgement of your email to the Kent, Surrey & Sussex Enforcement Office, which is the Fine Enforcement Unit for HM Courts & Tribunals Service.
We aim to reply within 5 working days. Emails are prioritised in date order.
When emailing you MUST provide the following information:
· Full name
· Address
· Account Number
· Current contact number
· Concise query
If you have not included the above, please resend your email as your query will take longer to answer.
CIVIL MATTERS are NOT dealt with by this office -
Including (but not limited to):
· Council tax prosecutions
· Council-issued Penalty Charge Notices for parking violations
· County court money claims
· Divorce
· Eviction
· Child access
Contact the relevant County Court: https://courttribunalfinder.service.gov.uk/
If you are unhappy about:
· the result of your case and want to challenge the Court's decision:
Contact CTSC: sjs@justice.gov.uk 0300 303 0656
If you are unhappy about:
· paid a fixed penalty
· pre-prosecution settlement beforehand
If you wish to complain about:
· The actions of the court
· The police
· The prosecution
Contact the relevant Magistrates Court: https://courttribunalfinder.service.gov.uk/
Payment terms can only be amended if you can show your circumstances have changed since either we or a court last considered them. If you have only just received a fine, you must go back to the court to ask them to reopen the case.
If you want to pay a penalty imposed after…
1) A case that was heard under the Single Justice Procedure or Common Platform - pay through your online banking service quoting your Common Platform case number or the URN number
2) A case heard by summons, postal requisition or charge - go to www.gov.uk/pay-court-fine-online or phone: 0300 790 9901. When paying online or by phone:
· You can pay 24 hours a day with a credit or debit card - Quote your 3-digit division code and your account number (8 digits plus a letter)
· You will be given an authorisation number – please keep this as proof of payment as we do not issue receipts.
Please be advised that if you wish to set up a direct debit you will need to call the contact centre on 0300 123 9252 as we are unable to do this via email.
If you would prefer to talk to us about your fine please call 0300 123 9252 Monday to Friday from 8am to 5pm.
Please note that we receive a very high number of calls however, so please be patient when trying to get through.
Further information can also be found on the GOV website: HM Courts & Tribunals Service - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)
This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
19TH AUGUST 2024. Complaint sent.
AUG 14th, ALERT!!! ASKING FOR MEDIATION ON SMALL CLAIMS CASE GOT IMMEDIATE BAN ON GLP. Previously we had been posting just fine for days if not weeks. The corruption goes deep.
OCMC COMPLAINTS
https://www.complaints.judicialconduct.gov.uk/makeacomplaint/
https://www.complaints.judicialconduct.gov.uk/magistratescomplaints/
AUG 14TH, UPDATE: NO RESPONSE FROM MEDIATION. Main letter
contactocmc@justice.gov.uk
Legal Beagles. Good site.
SENT WEDNESDAY JULY31ST...
MEDIMAIN - MEDIATIONMAIN
Dear Moneyclaim, and St Katharine's House,
I hope you are well this July morning. My name is Jake Mackenzie, writing to you regarding case number L7QZ9D42
MACKENZIE Vs GUARDIAN NEWS AND MEDIA LIMITED
I received Mr Adriano's letter on the 25th of July.
My response is as follows.
I certainly do not wish to abuse or obstruct any court process, as claimed by GMN and Mr Adriano, in 10(3.2) of their response.
image
I have never taken anyone to court before, and I am simply asking that this case be overseen by fair, impartial judges or mediators in St Katharine's House.
I wish only to recover money from the Guardian to start to cover the professional and financial damages I have incurred during the COVID episode. I did not ask for a higher amount, because I did not have more than 35 pounds to pay the court fee. My case is a very serious claim, for significant damages, and I see it as neither abusive nor frivolous.
I was previously a long time reader of The Guardian, since my teenage years. I found their actions from 2020 to 2023 to be disappointing, damaging, and dangerous. I lost work, business and money as a direct result of their negligence. I will make a short case in this letter. I am preparing a much longer slideshow right now.
Mediation is Requested Like the defendant, The Guardian, I seek a speedy resolution, without trial if possible.
I am open to mediation with a Moneyclaim Court officer, as long as I get a financial settlement which reflects both damages incurred, and the time I have spent compiling this case.
My tort is as follows:
I lost nearly two to three years worth of income as an English teacher in Taipei, as a direct result of COVID vaccine and lockdown regulations. Regulations which were promoted and supported by The Guardian. I can prove both a loss of earnings, and a healthy income prior to 2020, with screengrabbed emails and payslips.
My loss of earnings occurred because students were not allowed to come to class for a period lasting at least 18 months. Along with this, unvaccinated teachers were treated as second class citizens, and told to stay at home for even longer than those who chose to vaccinate. I have screen grabbed emails from my supervisor, Derek Rhodes of Kent, to prove all of this. As I have allergies to many modern medical ingredients, including penicillin, MSG and gluten, I was very worried about possible permanent damage or injury from barely tested vaccines. I saw friends suffer from Bell's Palsy, chronic fatigue, and uncontrollable shaking soon after being vaccinated. Thus, I stayed at home for most of 2020, to 2022, and lost a lot of money, due to inability to go into the office, and work. Work and travel are all basic human rights.
The virus and vaccine hysteria was disproportionate, void of sound medical logic, and potentially highly lucrative for many pharmaceutical companies. The Guardian of London, for a period of two to three years, was abjectly complicit in the hysteria and hype surrounding both the virus and vaccine solution.
They showed themselves to be:
Dismissive towards vaccine side effects, QUOTE Supportive of 'brutal but effective' lockdown practices, They also released articles composed of incoherent medical logic and spurious statistics. I am currently compiling an annotated slideshow, showing the Guardian's articles during this period. An unfinished draft is readable here:
https://github.com/Morningstar88/Guardian-UK-COVID/blob/main/README.md
There is therefore, a direct cause of action between three clear sets of facts :
The exaggerated and potentially baseless coverage of the 'virus' provided by the Guardian of London.
The lockdowns and virus regulations implemented by both the Taipei government, and the Taiwan business community. Many expatriates abroad are overseas readers of The Guardian. The lockdowns and regulations were a result of alarmist pandemic reporting from the Guardian, and other Western periodicals. If the Guardian contributed to the virus and vaccine, they are complicit, and responsible for their error. I can prove all this with screengrabbed Guardian articles.
Our previously healthy and popular language school, Core Corner of Zhongxiao Fuxing, lost a significant amount of money and students, due to Ministry of Education regulations, and decisions taken by supervisors. The Guardian is responsible for promoting the virus, and therefore, as adults of legal age, responsible for the consequences of their reporting.
CAUSE OF ACTION: I lost money during COVID lockdowns, as a result of hysterical virus coverage from the British press, including The Guardian. I am therefore claiming a monetary settlement.
Mr Adriano's strike out order, while bravely and beautifully written, is dismissive of the simple logic of my case, the negative events I have suffered, and the duty of care the London Guardian owes to the people of The United Kingdom.
I therefore, in the name of The King of England, request that a mediator be appointed, and we resolve this case, online, outside court, with vigor and alacrity.
If the Guardian were to reconsider their stance, I may offer the following resolution;
I will not speak publicly about any amount of money I have received from them. regarding Mr Stephen Goedhart
I am certainly willing to negotiate terms, if Mr Adriano would
I would like to remind the Guardian Media Group, that very real people, with very real lives, and very real businesses, have been permanently affected both medically, and . contemptous and disdainful. 1,2,3
If not, I am happy to go to hearing, as I feel I have a strong case. Pfizer are already being sued etc..
In summary
Please tell me what steps I need to take next to bring a swift end to this process.
Faithfully,
Jake Mackenzie
Moneyclaim.gov.uk
This URL probably best, not sure if the other ones are correct
SCROLL DOWN FOR ENTERING A JUDGEMENT, JULY 7TH.
Legal Emails received June 17th 2024.
GB-Northampton NN1 2LH Website address : https://www.moneyclaim.gov.uk Phone number : 0300 123 1057 E-mail address : MCOL@justice.gov.uk
Order date : 17/06/2024 15:31:28 Order reference : MCOL0002489375 Payment reference : 8052399389
Organisation Name - Guardian News & Media - Address - Kings Place, 90 York Way, London - Postcode N1 9GU
NO RESPONSE!!! MOST IMPORTANT LINK. Scroll down to: If you get no response, then Request a Judgement
REQUEST A JUDGEMENT goes through to here.
No claim showing.
DASHBOARD
Moneyclaims /\ Sign In PIN CODE: W8FIRSTLETONLYCAP
KEY INFO
https://www.gov.uk/make-court-claim-for-money/after-you-make-your-claim
Guardian Has 5 DAys to Contest.. So Far Silence.
If you get no response or the defendant refuses to pay what they owe You can ask the court to order the defendant to pay. You need to:
request a judgment if you made your claim online