Closed tsamardzic closed 1 year ago
@tsamardzic -- I didn't add examples 1, 2 and 3 -- they were there already. I suppose you can change the tags in your PR and that should make them more in-line with what you and I added.
@tsamardzic @bambooforest I think the problem is that different examples in Round have different levels of annotation. All annotations which are there should be included. The order of annotations is like in the first line: line, phonological, segmentation, morphomic, glossing, translation, comment.
I noted this as well and I included them when as they were given.
@christianbentz Yes, we both followed this order, but the problem is that our tags are inconsistent: for the same annotation level, we sometimes say it's \
@bambooforest lines 33-37, then 53 are also like 3 (must be something about the number 3! ;))
Round writes:
The first line (a) contains an orthographic form, divided by hyphens at approximate morph boundaries.9,10 The remaining lines of a maximally explicit gloss display (b) a surface (lexical level) phonological representation, which is unhyphenated; then (c) an underlying phonological representation; (d) a morphomic representation, and (e) a semantic and morphosyntactic gloss, all of which are hyphenated. For sentential examples, a free translation (f) is given in English and the source of the example is indicated.
This would be for:
So for example 2.27:
There is no phonological tier (i.e. an unhyphenated row).
But since he does use hyphens (at least at the end of words) with five rows, e.g.:
Your guess is as good as mine for what to do.
Yes, note that there is a bit of a mess-up here. The first example line (line_1) I gave is from Round (2013) which was published by Oxford University Press. All other lines seem to be from Round (2009) which is his original PhD thesis of which I gave you a pdf copy. The two documents differ somewhat with regards to the annotations and also the example sentences and numbering.
So, we should remove
So, here's my TODO list:
@christianbentz Any other items?
It would be a great help if you could leave here the revised version of the header. Thanks!
Here is the revised header. Note that I had to remove the hashtags at the beginning of each line:
language_name_wals: Kayardild
language_name_glotto: Kayardild
iso639_3: gyd
year_composed: NA
year_published: 2013
mode: spoken
genre_broad: grammar
genre_narrow: NA
writing_system: Latn
special_characters: Special characters follow IPA conventions and are detailed in Round (2009), p. 35.
short_description: These are example sentences from Round, Erich R. (2009).
source: Round, Erich R. (2009). Kayardild morphology, phonology and morphosyntax. PhD thesis, Yale University.
copyright_short: © Erich R. Round 2010, All rights reserved.
copyright_long: NA
sample_type: whole
comments: The annotations are explained in more detail in Round (2009), p. 31-32. The first line in each example (
@tsamardzic You could remove the
I think all these remarks were already integrated in https://github.com/MorphDiv/TeDDi_sample/blob/master/Corpus/Kayardild_gyd/grammar/spoken/gyd_gre_1.txt . I'm closing this issue.
Why is
but
?
I did everything like \<line 3>.