Closed a1t3g0 closed 6 months ago
Looks good to me. @betterbrand thoughts?
Looks good to me. @betterbrand thoughts?
Looks great to me 😄
Looks good to me. I'd like Rakshak to review
Moving this over to the new Docs repo.
Closing this PR. Please move over to the new repo.
The current Metamask model logic assumes that the LLM JSON response for transacting is correct.
Data validation is necessary for any LLM response to ensure (in this case) the JSON returned is correct and valid. This is very important as:
Initial proposed solution builds on existing logic to minimise refactoring the code base: These include:
Note: Class ethSendTransactions has been replaced with TransactionClass in order to support several Metamask transaction methods
Other improvements will be added in next PR - in consultation with the repository lead