Closed rmflight closed 1 year ago
Yes.
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023, 10:01 AM Robert M Flight @.***> wrote:
for those who want just a fast version of cor(..., method = "kendall"), should we have a wrapper that works almost the same way as the base correlation function?
something like
fast_kt(data, use = c("everything", "complete", "pairwise.complete")
And then it just does the basic kendall-tau, but fast?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/MoseleyBioinformaticsLab/ICIKendallTau/issues/11, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADEP7B43LOGA76OJDSYPUNDXPVMCRANCNFSM6AAAAAA2GB43YA . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
We discussed this in today's lab meeting, but I think the design should be:
NA
s, figure out how to do the pairwise comparisons.NA
correlation values in the resultant correlations.ici_kt
function, so we won't need to modify any code in the C++.
for those who want just a fast version of
cor(..., method = "kendall")
, should we have a wrapper that works almost the same way as the base correlation function?something like
And then it just does the basic kendall-tau, but fast?