Closed rmflight closed 2 years ago
Robert,
Split the scanlevel by m/z range. Do not do this for msnbase and xcalibur.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 10:07 AM Robert M Flight @.***> wrote:
in the peak comparisons, specifically comparing assigned peaks, we want to do two things for the 97lipid sample.
- Add an inset in the msnbase and xcalibur pieces that is zoomed in so that we can see the bimodal distribution.
- Split the msnbase and xcalibur by m/z range, and calculate the modes to see if they are actually different. This figure should go in supplemental.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/MoseleyBioinformaticsLab/manuscript.peakCharacterization/issues/25, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADEP7BZFGHFO6P4HHIZ6IQTVE3ILFANCNFSM5TKZOKDQ . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: <MoseleyBioinformaticsLab/manuscript.peakCharacterization/issues/25@ github.com>
Email: @. (work) @. (personal) Phone: 859-218-2964 (office) 859-218-2965 (lab) 859-257-7715 (fax) Web: http://bioinformatics.cesb.uky.edu/ Address: CC434 Roach Building, 800 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536-0093
OK, I think I figured out the bi-modality. We are reporting mz_difference, which naturally varies by mz, b/c we allow bigger differences as m/z increases.
Here you can see the density of the points where I've decreased transparency to 10%.
This explains the bimodality. So I think we need to do two things:
in the peak comparisons, specifically comparing assigned peaks, we want to do two things for the 97lipid sample.