Figure 1 could be improved. From where does the 18O isotopologue appear?
I'm not 100% sure about this comment. the 18O comes from natural abundance, no? Again, does this come down to bad caption, because we don't emphasize enough that we use the LOG transform of the intensities? Or do we need an inset where we show the raw intensities ....
I'm not 100% sure about this comment. the 18O comes from natural abundance, no? Again, does this come down to bad caption, because we don't emphasize enough that we use the LOG transform of the intensities? Or do we need an inset where we show the raw intensities ....