search

MoseleyBioinformaticsLab / manuscript.peakCharacterization

0 stars 1 forks source link

rev 2 - results - naively #44

Closed rmflight closed 2 years ago

rmflight commented 2 years ago

L75: I do not find ‘‘Naïvely’’ scientific enough to be used in this line.

For reference, this refers to the topical heading of 2.1

2.1. Naïvely Averaged Data Have Bad Relative Intensities

I guess we look at synonyms ...

rmflight commented 2 years ago

I think we can write some code to generate "naive" averages, or compare the XCalibur to the MSnbase intensities where I know it's doing an average to verify that XCalibur is averaging them in a bad, bad way.

rmflight commented 2 years ago

Fixed. Just went with simplistically