What is the base version number of MotionPlus being used?
0.1.x
What was the install method?
Built from source code
What is base architecture?
ARM-64bit
What is the distro being used?
Debian
Disto version number
Bookworm
Camera/Sound type(s) being used?
Network camera with RTSP
Describe the issue/problem and steps to reproduce
I successfully migrated from motion 4.6.0 to motionplus 0.2.0. My system is RockPiS (RK3308 64 bit ARM, 4 cores, 1GHz) with 3 network rtsp cameras. Motionplus was built with provided script. As I see, motionplus consumpts significantly more CPU resources (motion 4.6.0 average system load is 1.9-2.1, motionplus average load is 3.6-3.8).
I checked makefile and found no optimization options for g++ (as far as I see, -O2 enabled only for C-compiler). I manually added -O3 option for g++ and recompiled. Visually CPU utilization was reduced at least for 10-15%
Did you read the guide?
Yes
What is the base version number of MotionPlus being used?
0.1.x
What was the install method?
Built from source code
What is base architecture?
ARM-64bit
What is the distro being used?
Debian
Disto version number
Bookworm
Camera/Sound type(s) being used?
Network camera with RTSP
Describe the issue/problem and steps to reproduce
I successfully migrated from motion 4.6.0 to motionplus 0.2.0. My system is RockPiS (RK3308 64 bit ARM, 4 cores, 1GHz) with 3 network rtsp cameras. Motionplus was built with provided script. As I see, motionplus consumpts significantly more CPU resources (motion 4.6.0 average system load is 1.9-2.1, motionplus average load is 3.6-3.8).
I checked makefile and found no optimization options for g++ (as far as I see, -O2 enabled only for C-compiler). I manually added -O3 option for g++ and recompiled. Visually CPU utilization was reduced at least for 10-15%
Relevant MotionPlus log output (at log_level 8)