Closed conig closed 9 months ago
@tarensanders did we make a decision on this one?
Yeah, I was just finding it a PITA to get it out of the pooled model. Let me take another look at it.
@tarensanders can we close this? Or is this still something that needs doing?
@conig Urgh I'd forgotten about this.
I'm not totally sure what it was we were saying we would do here. I think we're saying that the time spent asleep was included in the calculation for the intensity metric, but the way to test if that matters would be comparing models with different measures of the intensity metric, right? (One with sleep, one without)
We didn't calculate PA intensity - it comes out of GGIR. So I'd have to redo the variable by hand to make it work. I think we're way past that point. I'd be happy to kick for touch and revisit if a reviewer thinks this is a mistake.
What are your thoughts?
That sounds like a lot of work for a minor point. I don't think we want to get in the business of validating GGIR's algorithms, it seems out of scope for the current paper. Let's close for now and see what the reviews say.
Is this relevant for how we have estimated
pa_intensity
from accelerometer data.