Closed conig closed 1 year ago
I think creating an index for sleep and PA, which will just be factor analysis for each is going to be the path of least resistence here.
I take this back, doesn't look like it's really a thing, and so we would need to validate any index we come up with. For this reason, I think risky to do. We would be in a similar situation with any latent variable approach. It's one thing to get a model to fit a latent sleep index, but another to ensure that latent factor is meaningful. For instance, does it make sense to average what time you go to sleep and how long you sleep? We would need to first create defendable scales for each variable where higher scores are better. We might be better off just to be in violation of the protocol on this point.
Agree - I vote for this being a protocol violation because there's no existing valid method. The results for what makes up the components are more interesting anyway
This last line in the analytic section of the protocol suggests that rather than looking at finite sleep dimensions we'd use an index, or Partial Least Squares regression which would create latent variables from each metric, and then look at the relationship.