Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
I had the same experience with Genshi (a Pythonic xml-centric template system
that I
like a lot!).
I'm using Genshi with TurboGears to generate iui pages. If you render them as
XML,
when the JavaScript code goes element.innerHTML = "<p>foo</p>", it doesn't get
parsed
and there are no child nodes. Apparently it's xml dom not html dom -- go
figure. So I
switched the template to output html. But the problem was iui needs to use
attributes
like selected="true". But the html serializer was rendering those as just
SELECTED,
so the iui dialogs do not get selected properly.
I've worked around it on the server side, but I agree that it would be nice if
iui
would accept html with SELECTED instead of selected="true". After all, in HTML,
the
mere presence of SELECTED means that an item is selected. I think iui should
interpret SELECTED the same as HTML does, if it's going to use the same
attribute as
HTML does. Another solution would be for iui to use a different attribute like
current="true" instead of one already used (and abused) by html.
I monkey patched genshi.output.XHTMLSerializer._BOOLEAN_ATTRS to remove
'select' from
the set of attributes that get munged, and it works ok for me now! But I wish
there
were a better way to selectively neutralize and fine tune what the html
serializer
did, on a per-template basis, not for the entire system.
-Don
Original comment by simhac...@gmail.com
on 4 Nov 2008 at 7:44
Here's a changeset that replaces [selected] with [shown] and also wraps the
handling in getShown() and setShown() functions:
http://code.google.com/r/msgilligan-iui-angular/source/detail?r=5df60ddd399c6e58
961ff160b3ab57b7751a7421&name=msgilligan-angularjs-test
We might do something like this in release 0.6.0
Original comment by msgilli...@gmail.com
on 22 Mar 2012 at 4:39
Original comment by msgilli...@gmail.com
on 22 Mar 2012 at 4:40
Issue 190 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by msgilli...@gmail.com
on 3 Apr 2012 at 10:07
-1
I'd rather stay with an attribute, why not "data-selected“ to match W3C
recommendation and stay future-proof ?
+ first screen to be used if no data-selected set
http://code.google.com/r/remigrumeau-iui-dev/source/detail?r=263299eb4c9f97ada41
c43a5602e4c77ed4ce749&name=no_selected_attribute
Original comment by remi.gru...@gmail.com
on 10 May 2012 at 9:31
Well, the change in comment #2 encapsulates the behavior in two functions.
That way it is easy to change the name of the attribute that is used or whether
it is an attribute at all. That's the important change. Whether it is a CSS
class or 'shown' or 'selected' or 'data-selected' or 'data-iui-selected' you
just have to change the code inside two functions.
Original comment by msgilli...@gmail.com
on 10 May 2012 at 9:55
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
dhtml.bl...@gmail.com
on 13 Sep 2007 at 4:28