[Sweep Rules] Code Formatting and Style Guide Issues

[sweep-ai[bot]]

PR Feedback (click)

• [ ] 👍 Sweep Did Well
• [ ] 👎 Sweep Needs Improvement

  I created this PR to address this rule:

  "Code should be properly formatted and follow the project's style guide."

  Description

  This PR addresses the code formatting and style guide issues in the following files:

• claims/old/claims5.py
• claims/old/r1.py
• claims/old/r2.py

The specific changes made are as follows:

• Consistent use of single quotes for string literals.
• Fixed inconsistent indentation using 4 spaces.
• Removed unused import statements.
• Removed unused variables.
• Removed redundant comments.
• Fixed inconsistent variable naming.
• Ensured consistent spacing around operators.
• Ensured consistent use of blank lines.
• Ensured consistent use of parentheses in if statements.
• Ensured consistent use of curly braces for dictionary literals.

Summary of Changes

• claims/old/claims5.py:

  • Fixed inconsistent use of quotes for string literals.
  • Fixed inconsistent indentation.
  • Removed unused imports.
  • Removed unused variables.
  • Removed redundant comments.
  • Fixed inconsistent variable naming.
  • Ensured consistent spacing around operators.
  • Ensured consistent use of blank lines.
  • Ensured consistent use of parentheses in if statements.
  • Ensured consistent use of curly braces for dictionary literals.

• claims/old/r1.py:

  • Fixed inconsistent use of quotes for string literals.
  • Fixed inconsistent indentation.
  • Removed unused imports.
  • Removed unused variables.
  • Removed redundant comments.
  • Fixed inconsistent variable naming.
  • Ensured consistent spacing around operators.
  • Ensured consistent use of blank lines.
  • Ensured consistent use of parentheses in if statements.
  • Ensured consistent use of curly braces for dictionary literals.

• claims/old/r2.py:

  • Fixed inconsistent use of quotes for string literals.
  • Fixed inconsistent indentation.
  • Removed unused imports.
  • Removed unused variables.
  • Removed redundant comments.
  • Fixed inconsistent variable naming.
  • Ensured consistent spacing around operators.
  • Ensured consistent use of blank lines.
  • Ensured consistent use of parentheses in if statements.
  • Ensured consistent use of curly braces for dictionary literals.

[sweep-ai[bot]]

Rollback Files For Sweep

• [ ] Rollback changes to claims/old/claims5.py
• [ ] Rollback changes to claims/old/claims5.py
• [ ] Rollback changes to claims/old/r1.py
• [ ] Rollback changes to claims/old/r1.py
• [ ] Rollback changes to claims/old/r2.py
• [ ] Rollback changes to claims/old/r2.py

[sweep-ai[bot]]

Sandbox Executions

• [X] Check claims/old/claims5.py ✓

  Sandbox logs for

trunk fmt claims/old/claims5.py || exit 0 1/2 ✓

  NOTICES  
 claims/old/claims5.py  ignored by .gitignore
 Hint: use --force to check ignored files
Found no applicable linters for the requested path

trunk check --fix --print-failures claims/old/claims5.py 2/2 ✓

  NOTICES  
 claims/old/claims5.py  ignored by .gitignore
 Hint: use --force to check ignored files
Found no applicable linters for the requested path

• [X] Check claims/old/r1.py ✓

  Sandbox logs for

trunk fmt claims/old/r1.py || exit 0 1/2 ✓

  NOTICES  
 claims/old/r1.py  ignored by .gitignore
 Hint: use --force to check ignored files
Found no applicable linters for the requested path

trunk check --fix --print-failures claims/old/r1.py 2/2 ✓

  NOTICES  
 claims/old/r1.py  ignored by .gitignore
 Hint: use --force to check ignored files
Found no applicable linters for the requested path

• [X] Check claims/old/r2.py ✓

  Sandbox logs for

trunk fmt claims/old/r2.py || exit 0 1/2 ✓

  NOTICES  
 claims/old/r2.py  ignored by .gitignore
 Hint: use --force to check ignored files
Found no applicable linters for the requested path

trunk check --fix --print-failures claims/old/r2.py 2/2 ✓

  NOTICES  
 claims/old/r2.py  ignored by .gitignore
 Hint: use --force to check ignored files
Found no applicable linters for the requested path

[coderabbitai[bot]]

[!IMPORTANT]

Auto Review Skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

---

Tips

### Chat with CodeRabbit Bot (`@coderabbitai`) - If you reply to a *review comment* from CodeRabbit, the bot will automatically respond. - To engage with CodeRabbit bot directly around the specific lines of code in the PR, mention @coderabbitai in your review comment - Note: Review comments are made on code diffs or files, not on the PR overview. - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. - `@coderabbitai resolve` to resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. Note: For conversation with the bot, please use the review comments on code diffs or files. ### CodeRabbit Configration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - The JSON schema for the configuration file is available [here](https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json). - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json`