Closed MrMineDe closed 3 days ago
Maybe it's a good idea to have a different character than + for this regex stuff?
+*
would be a good idea but do we need other regex capabilities? What could be real-world uses of that?
Would it be possible to just reserve +*
itself for the action?
I'd like +
too, the question is how to implement that.
In my head implementing the regex stuff is not very complicated and rather straight forward, but i'll test it. If its complicated i'd also opt to just support +*. I dont really have a real world use case, but it seems like a nice to have feature nontheless, if it's not complicated, but idk... + can be easily checked by checking if $A is 1 char long
It looks like it‘s a low priority issue not contributing to core functionality. If you struggle with the implementation, then at least let‘s postpone it.
fair. assigned p4
Solved with ++
instead of +*
because the shell struggles with it.
It also works with adding packages, it just puts the pkgs into all catfiles you currently have. :)
We have to detect regex, so we cant create a category file with random regex as name. Than we only work on the existing files