in line 582 and 583, there exists hydrosulferisation version of the key.
in line 605 and 606, there exists hydrosulfurisation version. which is the correct one regarding the recipe internal name.
however, both of them are wrong. hehehe
i think you meant "hydroDEsulfurization"
solution: we can remove line 582 and 583, also possibly change the key name with a migration. however, we should be changing the name "sulfurization" to "desulfurization" (s or z idk its murrican or british thing you decide it boss)
in line 582 and 583, there exists
hydrosulferisationversion of the key. in line 605 and 606, there existshydrosulfurisationversion. which is the correct one regarding the recipe internal name. however, both of them are wrong. hehehe i think you meant "hydroDEsulfurization" solution: we can remove line 582 and 583, also possibly change the key name with a migration. however, we should be changing the name "sulfurization" to "desulfurization" (s or z idk its murrican or british thing you decide it boss)