Open agramajo opened 6 years ago
Hi,
With this approach in code (use getaddressbalances), we can not see the balance in non-owned wallet.
https://github.com/MultiChain/multichain-explorer/blob/4f0749d4c6321335fc485d34f1b4044b7f8bdf3e/Mce/abe.py#L1854-L1874 )
Check this:
node1 (seed and with multichain explorer):
chain1: getaddressbalances 1BjxiATbrwntty1PQx95kk3fcV6FKNWAq4y3e7 {"method":"getaddressbalances","params":["1BjxiATbrwntty1PQx95kk3fcV6FKNWAq4y3e7"],"id":1,"chain_name":"chain1"} [ { "assetref" : "", "qty" : 0.00000000, "raw" : 0 } ] chain1: getaddresses {"method":"getaddresses","params":[],"id":1,"chain_name":"chain1"} [ "1DMsbx13P5iP42DLmdPiWmVCwRNQDPSo13b2PP" ] chain1: getaddressbalances 1DMsbx13P5iP42DLmdPiWmVCwRNQDPSo13b2PP {"method":"getaddressbalances","params":["1DMsbx13P5iP42DLmdPiWmVCwRNQDPSo13b2PP"],"id":1,"chain_name":"chain1"} [ { "assetref" : "", "qty" : 1000015.00000000, "raw" : 100001500000000 } ]
Explorer address 1DMsbx13P5iP42DLmdPiWmVCwRNQDPSo13b2PP
node2: with address 1BjxiATbrwntty1PQx95kk3fcV6FKNWAq4y3e7
chain1: getaddresses {"method":"getaddresses","params":[],"id":1,"chain_name":"chain1"} [ "1BjxiATbrwntty1PQx95kk3fcV6FKNWAq4y3e7" ] chain1: getaddressbalances 1BjxiATbrwntty1PQx95kk3fcV6FKNWAq4y3e7 {"method":"getaddressbalances","params":["1BjxiATbrwntty1PQx95kk3fcV6FKNWAq4y3e7"],"id":1,"chain_name":"chain1"} [ { "assetref" : "", "qty" : 12.00000000, "raw" : 1200000000 } ]
Explorer address 1BjxiATbrwntty1PQx95kk3fcV6FKNWAq4y3e7
Do you know if exists a better solution? I am starting to dig in the code to understand and try to fix it.
Regards and thanks for Multichain.
Hi,
With this approach in code (use getaddressbalances), we can not see the balance in non-owned wallet.
https://github.com/MultiChain/multichain-explorer/blob/4f0749d4c6321335fc485d34f1b4044b7f8bdf3e/Mce/abe.py#L1854-L1874 )
Check this:
node1 (seed and with multichain explorer):
Explorer address 1DMsbx13P5iP42DLmdPiWmVCwRNQDPSo13b2PP
node2: with address 1BjxiATbrwntty1PQx95kk3fcV6FKNWAq4y3e7
Explorer address 1BjxiATbrwntty1PQx95kk3fcV6FKNWAq4y3e7
Do you know if exists a better solution? I am starting to dig in the code to understand and try to fix it.
Regards and thanks for Multichain.