Open thewilkybarkid opened 3 years ago
Not presently, but it seems like a nice feature to have for tidiness. I guess it's generally not that big a problem to leave them around in the build unlinked, though? An extra megabyte's worth of charges in your S3 bucket?
How has --harfbuzz
been working for you, btw.? Have you noticed any glitches with the subset font files?
Not presently, but it seems like a nice feature to have for tidiness. I guess it's generally not that big a problem to leave them around in the build unlinked, though? An extra megabyte's worth of charges in your S3 bucket?
Indeed, not much of a problem, they're just redundant. I'm deleting them manually for the moment, but it'd be happy to have a less risky option.
How has
--harfbuzz
been working for you, btw.? Have you noticed any glitches with the subset font files?
I really like the idea of not having to go through Python; it seems to work pretty well, but I've turned it off for the moment as it doesn't include contextual alternates.
A very similar feature request came up here: https://github.com/Munter/hyperlink/issues/191
Maybe we could serve both use cases with a standalone tool. Looks like the main blocker is still that we don't have a good name for it -- and that it hasn't been created yet :sweat_smile:
How has
--harfbuzz
been working for you, btw.? Have you noticed any glitches with the subset font files?I really like the idea of not having to go through Python; it seems to work pretty well, but I've turned it off for the moment as it doesn't include contextual alternates.
Okay, thanks. It'll get there!
I'm trying out running subfont after a
parcel build
(refs https://github.com/Munter/subfont/issues/78):It works great, but the original font files are left behind in my build directly, but are unlinked. Is it possible to have them deleted?