This version is not covered by your current version range.
Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.
I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of mocha.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.
Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?
There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.
With Integrationsfirst-class bot support landed on GitHub and we’ve rewritten Greenkeeper to take full advantage of it. Simpler setup, fewer pull-requests, faster than ever.
Screencast Try it today. Free for private repositories during beta.
Coverage remained the same at 94.828% when pulling 8eefeec9fa8d5f762e753c2c48ac1e55c4c00ac6 on greenkeeper-mocha-3.3.0 into 5165805610a4ff418f50c2e8a016de2f0a5de592 on master.
Hello lovely humans,
mocha just published its new version 3.3.0.
This version is not covered by your current version range.
Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.
I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of mocha. Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.
Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right? Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?
There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.
Good luck with your project :sparkles:
You rock!
:palm_tree:
GitHub Release
Thanks to all our contributors, maintainers, sponsors, and users!❤️
As highlights:
--inspect-brk
on command-line (@igwejk)semistandard
directly (@kt3k)The new version differs by 268 commits .
fb1687e
:ship: Release v3.3.0
1943e02
Add Changelog for v3.3.0
861e968
Refactor literal play-icon hex code to a var
1d3c5bc
Fix typo in karma.conf.js
9bd9389
Fix spec paths in test HTML files
0a93024
Adds tests for loading reporters w/ relative/absolute paths (#2773)
73929ad
Comment special treatment of '+' in URL query parsing
e2c9514
Merge pull request #2769 from igwejk/support_inspect_break_in_opts
038c636
Support
--inspect-brk
on command-lineb4ebabd
Merge pull request #2727 from lamby/reproducible-build
882347b
Please make the build reproducible.
a2fc76c
Merge pull request #2703 from seppevs/cover_utils_some_fn_with_tests
ed61cd0
cover .some() function in utils.js with tests
f42cbf4
Merge pull request #2701 from craigtaub/landingSpec
6065242
use stubbed symbol
There are 250 commits in total. See the full diff.
Screencast
Try it today. Free for private repositories during beta.