Closed rux616 closed 1 month ago
Also, it seems like all the records have a FormKey of "XXXXXX:ShipVendorFramework.esm", when the plugin name is "Warhawk.esm"
Yeah, if you're referencing light masters, I think it'll be borked at the moment. I'll see if i can get #75 out soon
This is the output, but the ANAM entry and Items[0] should be reversed.
Are you saying it should look like
A)
FormKey: 000002:ShipVendorFramework.esm
EditorID: warhawk_ShipVendorDistribution_Location_NewAtlantis_Unique
FormVersion: 559
ANAM: 000822:Warhawk.esm
Items:
- 000001:ShipVendorFramework.esm
or B)
FormKey: 000002:ShipVendorFramework.esm
EditorID: warhawk_ShipVendorDistribution_Location_NewAtlantis_Unique
FormVersion: 559
Items:
- 000822:Warhawk.esm
ANAM: 000001:ShipVendorFramework.esm
can you upload your esm as well, for reference?
It should look like B.
As requested, here is the file for reference: Warhawk.zip
According to the binary, i think the original yaml is being true to the esm (aside from the mod index issues)
LNAM (the items) has the XX000001
ID
ANAM has the XX0000822
Can you double check in the other tooling that made the mod file that you think the IDs are swapped?
That's ... weird. I'm loading the thing up in the CK right now to verify.
Okay, xxxxx822 is from ShipVendorFramework.esm, and xxxxxx001 is from Warhawk.esm. So it looks like the ID in the original yaml is correct, but the source is messed up, possibly again having to do with #75.
Cool, gonna close this and will see you over in #75 ! Thanks for all the extra info!
Sure thing. Thanks for the quick responses!
Spriggit v0.25 mixes up the LNAM and ANAM subrecords if both are defined. (both "ShipVendorFramework.esm" and "Warhawk.esm" are light masters)
This is the output, but the contents of the ANAM entry and the content of the Items[0] entry should be reversed. (I'm trying to add
000822:Warhawk.esm
to000001:ShipVendorFramework.esm
.)Also, it seems like all the records have a FormKey of "XXXXXX:ShipVendorFramework.esm", when the plugin name is "Warhawk.esm". Might this be related to #75?