Open tramyn opened 6 years ago
There are a few reasons why this would be tricky.
1) This is included as a glyph icon, so we would need a glyph icon for every combination of components one might like to link. The only possibility would be to use the top-level glyph which would mean that in most cases this would be just a box (i.e., engineered region).
2) The "promoter" in iBioSim from a modeling perspective really only works in simulation for complete transcriptional units, so if the plan is to perform simulation, then it really should be a complete transcriptional unit.
However, my guess is you are using this to build interactions, which are not meant to be simulated individually. Rather this is a way to build interactions in SBOL. In that case, I can see the point to wanting to see the correct SBOL2 glyph. We could perhaps find a middle point that shows the top-level glyph then in the situation where it is an engineered region that happens to be a transcriptional unit, we could show the transcriptional unit rather than the box.
Currently, annotating iBioSim components with an SBOL component will replace iBioSim icon with a transcriptional unit icon. It would be nice if we support SBOL visual 2.0 icons instead. An example of this feature is annotating a species with a promoter retrieved from SynBioHub. After annotating the species, the shape representing the species is replaced with a transcriptional unit icon. What I would like to expect to see is a promoter icon instead since I am only annotating a promoter and not an entire transcriptional unit component.