The thing is in order to give the uncertainties on this numbers in the plots I missed to dived by sqrt of the number of experiments.
We provided just 10 experiments, then the bars should be smaller by just a factor of three. They where almost invisible, so this wouldn't be a big issue in the plots.
I propose to include from now the correction factor.
Let me know what you think, thanks.
Description
There could be an issue with the performance benchmark statistics. The problem relies in the following lines of code
Code example
https://github.com/N3PDF/pdfflow/blob/b5f608ceda1fb55adf3a3be63c4b321fe4e5dca6/benchmarks/compare_performance_lhapdf.py#L141-L146
Additional information
The thing is in order to give the uncertainties on this numbers in the plots I missed to dived by sqrt of the number of experiments.
We provided just 10 experiments, then the bars should be smaller by just a factor of three. They where almost invisible, so this wouldn't be a big issue in the plots.
I propose to include from now the correction factor. Let me know what you think, thanks.