Closed bradfordcondon closed 5 years ago
Yep, that's the way it is right now. Happy to have any improvements.
I switched to just looping through key/value pairs and setting in a table, with a "legend" lookup array to change the machine label for a human readable one.
More legible? It's certainly more code-friendly since the display is no longer hard-coded. I unset fields that have no value (for example sex and strain above), do we need to display those blank values @mpoelchau ?
It occurs to me that these fields should be editable by the admin to correct typos etc. I think that will be a "next release" feature since I'm liking the "workbench style" approach more and more...
merging without the approve/delete buttons, which will belong to #1
Editing a dataset (chado analysis) to confirm doesn't look styled properly to me:
from
/admin/structure/datasets/report
, edit a submission.Heres what http://localhost:8083/datasets/1/view looks like for me:
Is this comparable to what's live, or is there something wrong with the styling? In this case its using the "Assembly" template, which does seem to only make use of
<p>
and<b>
elements.Seems to me like using standard drupal table theming would be a big improvement from this.