Closed AnthonyGlt closed 2 days ago
The positioning of the tile set in the index example is a bit odd 😅 Maybe the automatic positioning logic could be improved. But I was able to get it in frame once and wasn't seeing any errors so this may need a more succinct repro.
index.js.txt Here is my index.js (to be renamed). Is it because I've put errorTarget & errorThreshold at 0 ? Did you do it too ? Are you sure you got everything in frame ? Video of what happens to me. I hope it will help to understand what happens :D
I see it now - I think this is related to #726 which I noticed last week. The LRUCache unload behavior isn't working correctly so I need to spend some time this next week figuring out what's going on. Setting the error target to 0 causes the buggy lru cache behavior to kick in.
Also I see that this tile set has two extremely far clusters of tiles making it difficult to see the extent / find the geometry:
Adding a new debug settings to display parent tile bounds (Both empty and not empty) would make tile sets like this easier to understand.
@AnthonyGlt do you mind retrying your test? The issue should have been fixed in #726, #727. I still want to fix #741 before a new release but everything should be stable again.
Yes it got fixed, well done ! :D
When I load this link https://storage.googleapis.com/ahp-research/projects/sogelink/hackathon/bdnb/sampleset/tileset.json which has implicitTiling The data is loading as expected but once everything is loaded, the
0_0_0.subtree
is fetched again and provoking errors Maybe it's caused by one of the implementations left todo but I don't see which one it could beTo Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
example/index.js
to load the linkgeospatialRotationParent.scale.set( 1, 1, 1 );
bygeospatialRotationParent.scale.set( 0.01, 0.01, 0.01 );
because the dataset is bigerrorTarget
&errorThreshold
at0
+ checkeddisplayRegionBounds
Screenshots