[nssdca-delivery] PDS_ATM Pack #8

[tinagueth]

Discipline Node Information

• Delivering Node: PDS_ATM

• NSSDCA Delivery Package: pdsatm_pack8_20221129.tar.gz

• Validation report: pdsatm_pack8_validationreports.tar.gz

NOTE: If you have multiple delivery packages, we strongly encourage you to submit these in batches of 3 to 10 per issue with one ZIP file of the packages and another ZIP file of the validation reports. Please use a descriptive title, such as "Node Mission misc batch #".

---

Engineering Node Process

See the internal EN process at https://pds-engineering.jpl.nasa.gov/content/nssdca_interface_process

[c-suh]

Slight delay due to errors in the validate report, about which I've asked a question of the developers and am waiting to hear back.

[tinagueth]

@c-suh Thanks for letting me know. I appreciate it.

[c-suh]

@tinagueth thank you for your patience! There are a few things to address; however, neither affect NSSDCA's processing of the data, so I went ahead and posted the two packages. From tomorrow, you can check the status at https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/psi/ReportPDS4.jsp using the SIP LIDs:

• urn:nasa:pds:system_bundle:product_sip_deep_archive:mars2020_meda_v1.0_20221129
• urn:nasa:pds:system_bundle:product_sip_deep_archive:mars2020_moxie_v5.0_20221129

In the meantime, please address the following:

• a friendly reminder to upgrade your installation of the Validate tool to its latest version (currently v3.0.3)
• the validation report for meda_bundlev5.txt shows a warning for an unreferenced member
• the validation report for meda_bundlev5.txt shows 3 errors for "Validation failed for flavour PDF/A-1b"
• the validation report for moxie_bundlev5.txt shows an error for "Validation failed for flavour PDF/A-1b"
• the validation report for moxie_bundlev5.txt shows an error for "Invalid PDF/A version detected"

Our document on PDF/A Guidelines may have useful information regarding these errors. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Thank you!

[tinagueth]

@c-suh Thank you for the information. I forwarded it to Lyle. He removed the unreferenced file as that was not supposed to be there, however he said the PDF/A-1b issues are going to persist (he did not elaborate further). I assume those issues might get resolved with the eventual final version of these bundles, but not currently. Thank you

[c-suh]

@tinagueth - thank you for passing along the information (in both directions)!

[tinagueth]

@c-suh You are welcome. I just want to make sure everyone is kept in the loop :)

[tinagueth]

@c-suh The AIP/SIP sets for these bundles have been archived