Closed mommermi closed 5 years ago
Currently, there is a lot of garbage in the bib results:
bib
INFO: Thank you for using sbpy. Your session results were based on: sbpy.bib.tests.test_bib.force: method: Newton 1687, Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica. Auctore Js. Newton test1: track_this: bibcode1 software: bibcode2 track_this_too: bibcode test2: software: bibcode test3: track_this: bibcode software: bibcode spectroscopy: fdsa: asdf Dust-free template spectrum of Bohlin 2014: Bohlin 2014, The Astronomical Journal, Vol 147, 6, 127 E490-00a (2014) reference solar spectrum (Table 3): doi:10.1520/E0490 sbpy.data.Ephem.from_horizons: data service: Giorgini, Yeomans, Chamberlin et al. 1996, AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts #28, 25.04 sbpy.data.Phys.from_sbdb: data service url: https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi activity.dust.Afrho: model: Ahearn, Schleicher, Millis et al. 1984, The Astronomical Journal, Vol 89, 579 activity.dust.Efrho: model: Kelley, Fernández, Licandro et al. 2013, Icarus, Vol 225, 1, 475 activity.dust.phase_HalleyMarcus: Halley-Marcus phase function: Schleicher & Bair 2011, The Astronomical Journal, Vol 141, 6, 177 Halley phase function: Schleicher, Millis & Birch 1998, Icarus, Vol 132, 2, 397 Marcus phase function: Marcus 2007, International Comet Quarterly, Vol 29, 39 [sbpy.bib.core]
Everybody, please check your submodules.
Looks like at least one bib test is not not leaving tracking disabled. I'll take care of it.
I think this is fixed. I haven't seen any extra lines after the tests.
Currently, there is a lot of garbage in the
bib
results:Everybody, please check your submodules.