Open oykubulca opened 5 years ago
1.) All works very well; all outcomes/interpretations are there and correct;, nicely comment and named variables. [2/2]
a.) all outcomes/interpretationd are nice and correct. Also nice and extensive Anova interpretation. [5/5]
b.) all results match the solution and very well interpreted the result. [3/3]
3.) data well plotted, hypothesis 4 is tested with as a single hypothesis, wherefore the interpretation is different, but based on your outcome, Anova and the interpretation seem correct.
4.) Bonus looks very nice, the color map and dots are correctly used and displayed. [bonus]
Good Job, especially nicely commented so very nice to correct! 2/2 for coding style
1) Works well, nicely commented. Variables are named as it should be. Code looks very clean and nice. Detailed interpretation of the result, the outcome seems correct. [2/2]
2a) Plot looks very good. Different conditions are well separated, axes and conditions named correctly, limit of the plot is correct. Anova table has been correctly interpreted. [5/5]
2b) Nicely commented, results in the table matches our results. Outcome seems correct. [3/3]
3) Again, very nice plot. Correctly labeled and title and limit of y axis are correct. Rotating the names of the variables in x axis is pretty cool. All of the code is well commented. Hypotheses for the interaction effects are grouped into one hypothesis, might be better if written separately. ANOVA table interpretation seems correct. [3/3]
4) Correct usage of the color map. Dots on the image looks as they should be. [BONUS]
Great job! Clear comments, works very well. 2/2 for coding style.