Assignment 0: Peer review for sheet 04 [3 pts]
You nicely reviewed group 2 and 11. 3/3
Assignment 1: Checking the data distribution [9 pts]
a) loading datasets [0 pts]
b) data cleaning [3 pts]
--> very clean and effective, perfect! 3/3
c) visualizing data distribution [3 pts]
--> these look beautiful and display what they should! 3/3
d) normally distributed data [3 pts]
--> nice q-q-plots. the interpretation could refer more to the not-adapting-parts as the border areas, but in general in strict interpretation I agree. the second plot could be plotted as that it does appear more in one continuous line, but it fulfills it's purpose. 3/3
Assignment 2: Hypothesis testing [3 pts]
--> whoups, you somehow messed up the data, because the p-values were supposed to be way smaller. As still the general account to do the anova and your according interpretation is right, still 2/3
Assignment 3: Binning [4 pts]
a) distribution of # fixation [2 pts]
--> you could have inserted sth so that this plot is nicer to look at and easier to read 1,5/2
b) leftward bias [2 pts]
--> perfectly fine! 2/2
Assignment 4: Heatmap [4 pts]
--> Nicely done, effective use of the for-loop! 4/4
Assignment 5: Scanpath [5 pts]
--> perfectly coded, you could have changed some of the features that the dots are easier to track 4,5/5
@Traumfaengerin, I wouldn't take points away for small styling preferences.
@luisa-sophia, Here one-way repeated ANOVA has to be used because we repeat over subjects
Assignment 0: Peer review for sheet 04 [3 pts] You nicely reviewed group 2 and 11. 3/3
Assignment 1: Checking the data distribution [9 pts] a) loading datasets [0 pts] b) data cleaning [3 pts] --> very clean and effective, perfect! 3/3 c) visualizing data distribution [3 pts] --> these look beautiful and display what they should! 3/3 d) normally distributed data [3 pts] --> nice q-q-plots. the interpretation could refer more to the not-adapting-parts as the border areas, but in general in strict interpretation I agree. the second plot could be plotted as that it does appear more in one continuous line, but it fulfills it's purpose. 3/3
Assignment 2: Hypothesis testing [3 pts] --> whoups, you somehow messed up the data, because the p-values were supposed to be way smaller. As still the general account to do the anova and your according interpretation is right, still 2/3
Assignment 3: Binning [4 pts] a) distribution of # fixation [2 pts] --> you could have inserted sth so that this plot is nicer to look at and easier to read 1,5/2 b) leftward bias [2 pts] --> perfectly fine! 2/2
Assignment 4: Heatmap [4 pts] --> Nicely done, effective use of the for-loop! 4/4
Assignment 5: Scanpath [5 pts] --> perfectly coded, you could have changed some of the features that the dots are easier to track 4,5/5
Coding Style: super easy and concise! 2/2
Overall 28/30