NCAR / CARMA_dev

Discussions on CARMA development and descriptions of model simulations
3 stars 0 forks source link

FWmaHIST_MAM4_nudged_f19.carma_trop_strat.may11_2023.1990_1995 mixfix cases #35

Open tilmes opened 1 year ago

tilmes commented 1 year ago

Different model runs were performed to test differences in the mie code as discussed in https://github.com/NCAR/CARMA_dev/discussions/29 Model simulations are tested for FWmaHIST nudged cases 1990-1993 (or longer)

tilmes commented 1 year ago

@cbardeen Here are some results of the runs I did: mixfix causes a reduction in extinction in polar latitudes, mixfix2 is changing this back. Extinction comparisons 1990 (background conditions)

image

Relative differences between different schemes:

image

Extinction comparisons 1991

image image

Comparisons to MAM (new mixfix2 and mixfix3 look good over Mt Pinatubo (currently till the end of 1991)

image

Total AOD for SOA, POM, BC closer to MAM when using mixfix2 or mixfix3:

image
tilmes commented 1 year ago

@cbardeen some interesting changes: Mixfix2 does get rid of a peak AODSO4dn at the start of Mt Pinatobu. AOD SOA, BC, POM are now more similar to MAM, is seems more realistic. Absorption has not changed much with mixfix2 and mixfix3.

tilmes commented 1 year ago

here are some more plots, including 1992:

image image image image
tilmes commented 1 year ago

@cbardeen here are the CAMcem runs in comparison to ATom, it helped a little bit, but indeed not much if using a log-scale for the comparison, the updated mixfix3 is shown in orange

image