Open marack opened 5 years ago
It's true that there is redundancy. Most radars have constant gate spacing, and if spacing_is_constant is true, you can use the other params as they are without needing to check all the way through the range array every time to figure out that everything is at constant spacing. I feel we need some compromise here, between ease of use and theoretical considerations.
A couple of minor issues with the
range
coordinate variable specification in section5.2.2
(page 25):long_name
attribute value is styled as astandard_name
. Long names are intended to be human readable (suitable for plot / axis titles). Suggest we change it to "Range to measurement volume".spacing_is_constant
,meters _to_center_of_first_gate
andmeters_between_gates
are technically redundant since this data can be obtained from the array itself. I'm worried about what happens if these values disagree with the array. Do we really need them?