Closed anewman89 closed 4 years ago
probably so - it's a minor comment. perhaps one could have a list of static and a list of dynamic predictors ...
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 4:35 PM Andy Newman notifications@github.com wrote:
@anewman89 commented on this pull request.
In downscale/estimate_forcing_regression.f90 https://github.com/NCAR/GMET/pull/19#discussion_r441179968:
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ ! AWW-2016Jan, modifications to handle time subsetting and reduce mem alloc, and clean up ! renamed from estimate_precip; add also 'directory' var, changed some var names
-subroutine estimate_forcing_regression (nPredict, gen_sta_weights, sta_weight_name, nwp_input_list, & +subroutine estimate_forcing_regression (sta_limit, nPredict, gen_sta_weights, sta_weight_name, nwp_input_list, &
nPredict could be set based on the number of inputs the user specifies rather than having it in the config file. We should do that in another request?
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/NCAR/GMET/pull/19#discussion_r441179968, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABIKARPSWM4HLJKN5NQFJB3RW7XTLANCNFSM4N6YTTFA .
I need to close this PR and reevaluate. I may have mixed something up with the timing of this PR and #18.
This needs to be merged after pull request #18 is merged.