b.cesm3_cam058_mom_e.B1850MOM.ne30_L32_t061.camdev_cice5.021

[cecilehannay]

Description:

Same as 020 + no-leak topo file:

bnd_topo  = '/glade/p/cgd/amp/juliob/bndtopo/latest/ne30pg3_gmted2010_modis_bedmachine_nc3000_Laplace0100_20220622.nc'

Case directory: Locally (if still available): /glade/p/cesmdata/cseg/runs/cesm2_0/b.cesm3_cam058_mom_e.B1850MOM.ne30_L32_t061.camdev_cice5.021

On github: https://github.com/NCAR/amwg_dev/tree/b.cesm3_cam058_mom_e.B1850MOM.ne30_L32_t061.camdev_cice5.021

Sandbox: Locally (if still available): /glade/work/hannay/cesm_tags/cesm3_cam6_3_058_MOM_e

On github: hash: 8f70c08

Diagnostics: AMWG diags (if available) https://webext.cgd.ucar.edu/B1850MOM/b.cesm3_cam058_mom_e.B1850MOM.ne30_L32_t061.camdev_cice5.021/atm/

Contacts: @cecilehannay, @gustavo-marques, @JulioTBacmeister, @PeterHjortLauritzen, @adamrher

[JulioTBacmeister]

Runs 020 (+ cam_dev, #153 ) and 021 (+ cam_dev +no_leak_topo, #155 ) appear to be staying in the "pack" of acceptable runs. I suggest letting them run out to 50 years. If @gustavo-marques diagnoses sufficient Lab Sea/N Atlantic convection in 020 and 021 we have two atmosphere mods left to test (see discussion #154) : 1) L32==> L58 and 2) B1850==>BWsc1850.

I'd suggest we just start two new coupled runs at the same time with these changes.

Note: 009 is "target configuration" SE+cam_dev+no_leak_topo+L58+CICE6

[megandevlan]

The surface fluxes in the Lab Sea region seem pretty reasonable so far as well:

Interestingly though, the global average SHFLX is a bit lower than the rest of the pack in both 020 and 021, as is the LWCF. I don't see that coming through in the regional plots though, so this is probably stemming from somewhere else globally (and maybe of less interest as a result).

[gustavo-marques]

I did a quick check with ncview and we are getting enough Lab Sea/N. Atlantic convection in 020 and 021. I agree on letting these cases run out to 50 years.

Sounds good about starting two new cases to evaluate the effects of 1) L32==> L58 and 2) B1850==>BWsc1850.

[cecilehannay]

@gustavo-marques: 020 and 021 are respectively 36 years and 23 years. I will extent them to 50 years and I will start 022 and 023.

@JulioTBacmeister: please could you clarify the order you have in mind when you say: 1) L32==> L58 2) B1850==>BWsc1850

On Friday, we talked about: 022 = 021 + BWsc1850 023 = 021 + BWsc1850 + L58

[cecilehannay]

020 and 021 were on hold yesterday because we had reached the account threshold but I resubmitted them.

[JulioTBacmeister]

021 seems OK through year 28 on the atmosphere side. @gustavo-marques would you check the convection?

[gustavo-marques]

Lab Sea convection looks good so far. Both, 020 and 021, are similar to 018b and 019b in terms of subpolar N. Atlantic behavior.

[fobryan3]

Gustavo beat me to the punch, but I agree both 20 and 21 look good. Here is my version of time series of ML properties in the Lab Sea. MLD_Series.LabradorSea.pdf