Open cecilehannay opened 1 year ago
@justin-richling I found the diags for this run in the webext directory. They helped us inform the parameters for the next batch of runs. Thanks!
@adamrher You beat me to it, I was waiting on the stubborn observations.
The ADF diags against f.cam6_3_112.FLTHIST_v0c.ne30.non-ogw-ubcT-effgw0.3-rdg_beta0.5.001 and Obs are here
Note from @adam: We pushed vtrmi maybe a bit too hard in #313, as the LWCF went down to ~20 W/m2 (but it did recover a good tape recorder). Nonetheless we want to see if a smaller increase from 1->1.5 gives us a better cloud field.
+> This is what we are doing in: #316
Description:
Same as #296 except:
and add HB source mods:
Case directory: Locally (if still available): /glade/p/cesmdata/cseg/runs/cesm2_0/f.cam6_3_112.FLTHIST_v0c.ne30.non-ogw-ubcT-effgw0.3-rdg_beta0.5-vtrmi2.0.001
On github: https://github.com/NCAR/amwg_dev/tree/f.cam6_3_112.FLTHIST_v0c.ne30.non-ogw-ubcT-effgw0.3-rdg_beta0.5-vtrmi2.0.001
Sandbox: Locally (if still available): /glade/work/hannay/cesm_tags/cam6_3_112
On github: (https://github.com/ESCOMP/CAM/tree/cam6_3_112)
Diagnostics: ADF diags (if available) https://webext.cgd.ucar.edu/FLTHIST/f.cam6_3_112.FLTHIST_v0c.ne30.non-ogw-ubcT-effgw0.3-rdg_beta0.5-vtrmi2.0.001/atm/
Contacts: @JulioTBacmeister @PeterHjortLauritzen @adamrher @cecilehannay