Closed adamrher closed 1 year ago
@klindsay28: Gustavo mentioned to me the ocean group wanted to modify the diag_table in the next run. I don't have the new diag_table. Is it ok to start the run with the current one?
@cecilehannay , sorry I missed this earlier.
I'm not sure what Gustavo had in mind.
However, he did update some stuff in
/glade/scratch/gmarques/for_cecile/diag_table
.
For now, please use that, replacing the case name there with your new case name.
klindsay28: I started the run with the diag_table I had. But I could edit the diag_table when continuing the run.
see run #361
The changes that I'm aware of Gustavo putting into that file modified the filenames of transports across various sections.
A drawback with the current diag_table is that it is not compatible with MOM6 archive pattern matching in this tag, so the files are not getting moved to $DOUT_S/ocn/hist.
So a benefit of changing diag_table is that newly written transports files would get archived. However, it would also change filename patterns mid-run, making analysis rather inconvenient.
Option 1: Leave diag_table as is, manually move transports files to $DOUT_S/ocn/hist
Option 2: Update diag_table, manually move existing transports files to $DOUT_S/ocn/hist, and rename them to match new filename patterns.
Option 1 seems like the least work to me. I suggest going with that.
Description of the run
Same as #356 except
Suffix in the casename
Suffix
Namelist modifications
Namelist
Source modifications
SourceMods
Sandbox
Requested sandbox or tag
Contact info
@adamrher @PeterHjortLauritzen
Any other relevant information
Enter relevant info