Open cecilehannay opened 1 year ago
I have added sea ice diagnostics for this run.
I added atm diagnostics here:
On the plots it just says years 1-2, which I don't understand since there are 22 years available and I processed all of them, as you can see in the name of the folder above (ie "1_22_vs_Obs"). Maybe that's a bug? Is there a way to know if it's really 2 or 22 years?
I added atm diagnostics here:
On the plots it just says years 1-2, which I don't understand since there are 22 years available and I processed all of them, as you can see in the name of the folder above (ie "1_22_vs_Obs"). Maybe that's a bug? Is there a way to know if it's really 2 or 22 years?
Thanks, @bstephens82. Are results posted anywhere from a run that has a similar configuration but uses CLUBB's default Lscale code? Also, I didn't find output of PRECT.
From the comparison with obs, the taus run appears to have near-coastal Sc that are too dim and excessively bright sub-equatorial regions. The bright sub-equatorial regions may be manifesting themselves as a strong double-ITCZ.
@vlarson I'm sure we could run some diagnostics comparing this case to a somewhat similar Lscale case. I will also be uploading diags for the taus run with my non-CLUBB parameters (still running) and we can see if these two taus runs are significantly different as well.
@vlarson here are some additional diagnostics comparing this case (test 044) to test 037, which should be identical apart from the CLUBB setup; i.e. 37 is using the Lscale code, but 044 is using taus along with the other flags/paremeters I got from Zhun, for the most part. I tweaked a few things like gamma and C8. https://webext.cgd.ucar.edu/BLT1850/b.e23_alpha16b.BLT1850.ne30_t232.044/atm/b.e23_alpha16b.BLT1850.ne30_t232.044_1_40_vs_b.e23_alpha16b.BLT1850.ne30_t232.037_1_40/website/
Some diagnostics comparing the first 25 years of this experiment and 043: https://webext.cgd.ucar.edu/BLT1850/b.e23_alpha16b.BLT1850.ne30_t232.044/atm/b.e23_alpha16b.BLT1850.ne30_t232.044_1_25_vs_b.e23_alpha16b.BLT1850.ne30_t232.043_1_25/website/
Some diagnostics comparing the first 25 years of this experiment and 043: webext.cgd.ucar.edu/BLT1850/b.e23_alpha16b.BLT1850.ne30_t232.044/atm/b.e23_alpha16b.BLT1850.ne30_t232.044_1_25_vs_b.e23_alpha16b.BLT1850.ne30_t232.043_1_25/website
This experiment (044) has brighter (i.e., improved) near-coastal Sc than does (043). It is unclear to me which of the tuning differences between 044 and 043 leads to the improvement, although the tuner suggests that maybe it's the changes in vtrmi or wsub_scale.
Description:
Same as https://github.com/NCAR/amwg_dev/issues/398, but using the
37
tuning for the non-clubb tunings and also forclubb_gamma_coef
andclubb_gamma_coefb
This run includes namelist changes and SourceMods. All of these described below.
Case directory: Locally (if still available): /glade/p/cesmdata/cseg/runs/cesm2_0/b.e23_alpha16b.BLT1850.ne30_t232.044
On github: https://github.com/NCAR/amwg_dev/tree/b.e23_alpha16b.BLT1850.ne30_t232.044
Sandbox: Locally (if still available): /glade/work/hannay/cesm_tags/cesm2_3_alpha16b_taus
The details of how to create this sandbox are available below.
Diagnostics: Diags (if available)
https://webext.cgd.ucar.edu/BLT1850/b.e23_alpha16b.BLT1850.ne30_t232.044/
Output: Output (if still available): /glade/derecho/scratch/hannay/archive/b.e23_alpha16b.BLT1850.ne30_t232.044/
Contacts: @bstephens82, @vlarson, @JulioTBacmeister, @PeterHjortLauritzen, @adamrher, @cecilehannay
Extra details:
Sandbox
Namelist changes
user_nl_cam
user_nl_clm
user_nl_cice
user_nl_mom
SourceMods
Looks at the SourceMods in:
/glade/p/cesmdata/cseg/runs/cesm2_0/b.e23_alpha16b.BLT1850.ne30_t232.043/SourceMods
src.cam
src.clm
src.mom