b.e23_alpha16b.BLT1850.ne30_t232.054

cecilehannay commented 1 year ago

Description: New baseline based on tag cesm2_3_alpha16g

dust tuning: (see full user_nl_cam below)
```
dust_emis_fact = 1.3
```

reduced spreading for liquid runoff

./xmlchange ROF2OCN_LIQ_RMAPNAME=/glade/work/gmarques/cesm/tx2_3/runoff_mapping/map_r05_to_tx2_3_nnsm_e250r250_230914.nc
./xmlchange GLC2OCN_LIQ_RMAPNAME=/glade/work/gmarques/cesm/tx2_3/runoff_mapping/map_gland4km_to_tx2_3_nnsm_e250r250_230914.nc

user_nl_clm

use_init_interp = .true.
fsurdat = '/glade/work/slevis/git/mksurfdata_toolchain/tools/mksurfdata_esmf/surfdata_ne30np4.pg3_SSP5-8.5_78pfts_CMIP6_1850-2100_c230227.nc'
finidat='/glade/p/cgd/tss/people/oleson/CLM5_restarts/ctsm51_cesm23a14a_ne30pg3ne30pg3mg17_CPLHIST_1850pAD.clm2.r.0561-01-01-00000.nc'

source mods for clm

In: /glade/p/cesmdata/cseg/runs/cesm2_0/b.e23_alpha16b.BLT1850.ne30_t232.054/SourceMods/src.clm/
clm_varpar.F90
surfrdMod.F90

user_nl_cice

f_fresh = 'mxxxx'
f_fresh_ai = 'mxxxx'
ice_ic = '/glade/p/cesmdata/cseg/inputdata/cesm2_init/gmom.e23.GJRAv4.TL319_t061_zstar_N65.tx2_3v2.001/0061-01-01/gmom.e23.GJRAv4.TL319_t061_zstar_N65.tx2_3v2.001.cice.r.0061-01-01-00000.nc'

user_nl_mom

MEKE_GEOMETRIC_ALPHA = 0.10
MIN_SALINITY = 1.e-06

IMPORTANT NOTE: The run was done with the tag: cesm2_3_alpha16g The name of the run should have been: b.e23_alpha16g.BLT1850.ne30_t232.054 instead of b.e23_alpha16b.BLT1850.ne30_t232.054

Case directory:

Locally (if still available): /glade/p/cesmdata/cseg/runs/cesm2_0/b.e23_alpha16b.BLT1850.ne30_t232.054
On github: https://github.com/NCAR/amwg_dev/tree/b.e23_alpha16b.BLT1850.ne30_t232.054

Sandbox:
Locally (if still available): /glade/work/hannay/cesm_tags/cesm2_3_alpha16g
On github: https://github.com/ESCOMP/cesm/tree/cesm2_3_alpha16g

Diagnostics:
Diags (if available): https://webext.cgd.ucar.edu/BLT1850/b.e23_alpha16b.BLT1850.ne30_t232.054/

Output:
Raw output on derecho (if still available): /glade/derecho/scratch/hannay/archive/b.e23_alpha16b.BLT1850.ne30_t232.054/
CAM Climos: /glade/campaign/cgd/amp/amwg/climo/b.e23_alpha16b.BLT1850.ne30_t232.054

Contacts: @cecilehannay, @gustavo-marques, @adamrher, @PeterHjortLauritzen, @JulioTBacmeister

Extra details:

The complete user_nl_cam is:

mfilt           =       0,       5,     20,      40,      12,       120,      1,   1
nhtfrq              =       0,     -24,    -24,      -3,       0,       -2,      0,  -8760
ndens               =       2,       2,      2,       2,       2,       1,      2,   1
interpolate_output  =  .true.,  .true., .true., .false., .false., .true.,  .true.
interpolate_nlat    =     192,     192,    192,     192,     192,     192,   192
interpolate_nlon    =     288,     288,    288,     288,     288,     288,   288 

empty_htapes = .true.

fincl1 = 'ACTNI', 'ACTNL', 'ACTREI', 'ACTREL', 'AODDUST', 'AODVIS', 'AODVISdn','BURDENBC', 'BURDENDUST', 'BURDENPOM', 'BURDENSEASALT', 
'BURDENSO4', 'BURDENSOA', 'CAPE', 'CCN3', 'CDNUMC', 'CH4', 'CLDHGH', 'CLDICE', 'CLDLIQ', 'CLDLOW', 'CLDMED', 'CLDTOT', 'CLOUD', 'CMFMC_DP', 
'CT_H2O', 'DCQ', 'DQCORE', 'DTCOND', 'DTCORE', 'DTV', 'EVAPPREC', 'EVAPSNOW', 'FCTI', 'FCTL', 'FICE', 'FLDS', 'FLNS', 'FLNSC', 'FLNT', 'FLNTC', 'FLUT', 
'FREQZM', 'FSDS', 'FSDSC', 'FSNS', 'FSNSC', 'FSNT', 'FSNTC', 'FSNTOA', 'ICEFRAC', 'LANDFRAC', 'LHFLX', 'LWCF', 'MPDICE', 'MPDLIQ', 'MPDQ', 'MPDT', 
'OCNFRAC', 'OMEGA', 'OMEGA500', 'PBLH', 'PHIS', 'PINT', 'PMID', 'PRECC', 'PRECL', 'PRECSC', 'PRECSL', 'PRECT', 'PS', 'PSL', 'PTEQ', 'PTTEND', 'Q', 
'QFLX', 'QRL', 'QRS', 'QTGW', 'RCMTEND_CLUBB', 'RELHUM', 'RVMTEND_CLUBB', 'SHFLX', 'SOLIN', 'SST', 'STEND_CLUBB', 'SWCF', 
'T', 'TAUX', 'TAUY', 'TFIX', 'TGCLDIWP', 'TGCLDLWP', 'TMQ', 'TREFHT', 'TS', 'TTGW', 'U', 'U10', 'UBOT', 'UTGWORO', 'UTGW_TOTAL', 
'V', 'VBOT', 'VTGWORO', 'VTGW_TOTAL', 'WPRTP_CLUBB', 'WPTHLP_CLUBB', 'Z3', 'ZMDQ', 'ZMDT', 'N2O', 'CO2','CFC11','CFC12', 
'CLD_MISR','FISCCP1_COSP','CLD_CAL','CLD_MISR','CLDTOT_CAL','CLDHGH_CAL', 'CLDMED_CAL','CLDLOW_CAL','CLMODIS', 'AODVISdn',
'CCN3', 'CDNUMC', 'H2O', 'NUMICE', 'NUMLIQ','OMEGA500'

fincl3 = 'PRECT', 'PRECC', 'FLUT', 'U850', 'U200', 'V850', 'V200', 'OMEGA', 'PSL'

fincl4 =  'PRECC','PRECL'

fincl5 = 'Uzm','Vzm','Wzm','THzm', 'VTHzm','WTHzm','UVzm','UWzm'
phys_grid_ctem_nfreq=-6
phys_grid_ctem_zm_nbas=120
phys_grid_ctem_za_nlat=90

fincl7= 'AQSO4_H2O2','AQSO4_O3', 'bc_a1', 'bc_a4', 'dst_a1', 'dst_a2', 'dst_a3', 'ncl_a1',
'ncl_a1', 'ncl_a2', 'ncl_a3', 'pom_a1', 'pom_a4', 'so4_a1', 'so4_a2', 'so4_a3',
'soa_a1', 'num_a1', 'num_a2', 'num_a3', 'num_a4',
'bc_a1SFWET', 'bc_a4SFWET', 'dst_a1SFWET', 'dst_a2SFWET', 'dst_a3SFWET', 'ncl_a1SFWET',
'ncl_a2SFWET', 'ncl_a3SFWET', 'pom_a1SFWET', 'pom_a4SFWET', 'so4_a1SFWET', 'so4_a2SFWET', 'so4_a3SFWET', 'soa_a1SFWET',
'soa_a2SFWET', 'bc_c1SFWET', 'bc_c4SFWET', 'dst_c1SFWET', 'dst_c2SFWET', 'dst_c3SFWET', 'ncl_c1SFWET', 'ncl_c2SFWET',
'ncl_c3SFWET', 'pom_c1SFWET', 'pom_c4SFWET', 'so4_c1SFWET', 'so4_c2SFWET', 'so4_c3SFWET', 'soa_c1SFWET', 'soa_c2SFWET',
'bc_a1DDF', 'bc_a4DDF', 'dst_a1DDF', 'dst_a2DDF', 'dst_a3DDF', 'ncl_a1DDF', 'ncl_a2DDF', 'ncl_a3DDF',
'pom_a1DDF', 'pom_a4DDF', 'so4_a1DDF', 'so4_a2DDF', 'so4_a3DDF', 'soa_a1DDF', 'soa_a2DDF',
'so4_a1_CLXF', 'so4_a2_CLXF', 'SFbc_a4', 'SFpom_a4', 'SFso4_a1', 'SFso4_a2',
'so4_a1_sfgaex1', 'so4_a2_sfgaex1', 'so4_a3_sfgaex1', 'soa_a1_sfgaex1', 'soa_a2_sfgaex1',
'SFdst_a1','SFdst_a2', 'SFdst_a3', 'SFncl_a1', 'SFncl_a2', 'SFncl_a3',
'num_a2_sfnnuc1', 'SFSO2', 'OCN_FLUX_DMS', 'SAD_SULFC', 'SAD_TROP', 'SAD_AERO'

dust_emis_fact = 1.3

adamrher commented 1 year ago

Hi @cecilehannay, just an FYI I can confirm that the reduced radius liquid runoff files you are manually setting are correctly set out of the box in cesm2_3_alpha_16g.

cecilehannay commented 1 year ago

Thanks @adamrher. As well as the user_nl_mom (I confirmed that with Gustavo too).

gustavo-marques commented 1 year ago

We still need MIN_SALINITY = 1.e-06 in user_nl_mom but we no longer need MEKE_GEOMETRIC_ALPHA = 0.10

adamrher commented 1 year ago

Would be interesting to see diags of 54 versus 52, as we are seeing some differences in the Arctic, which may be due to the larger dust_emissions_factor in 54.

cecilehannay commented 1 year ago

Indeed, the ADF diagnostics of 54 versus 52 are already available. As expected, the AODDUST shows a significant decrease of the dust. https://webext.cgd.ucar.edu/BLT1850/b.e23_alpha16b.BLT1850.ne30_t232.054/atm/html_img/plot_page_AODDUST_ANN_LatLon_Mean.html

adamrher commented 1 year ago

Thanks! For reference:

temp_tseries_SST

wwieder commented 1 year ago

@slevis-lmwg or @olyson can you run LMWG diagnostics on this case.

@dlawrenncar do you want these for the CESM project meeting next week, or for a later date? BTW, the timing matters here, as if we need them for next week Sam will have to do this, otherwise, I suggest Keith do it later.

olyson commented 1 year ago

I've been running LMWG diagnostics on these coupled cases fairly regularly. In general, they can be found at: https://webext.cgd.ucar.edu/BLT1850/

For 054 in particular: https://webext.cgd.ucar.edu/BLT1850/b.e23_alpha16b.BLT1850.ne30_t232.054/lnd/b.e23_alpha16b.BLT1850.ne30_t232.054.25_44-b.cesm3_cam058_mom_e.B1850WscMOM.ne30_L58_t061.camdev_cice5.026g.25_44/setsIndex.html

Trends are through year 44. The simulation is now through year 54. I'll update the diags when I'm back in the office. The comparison for these has been to 026g, but if there is a better control case for these let me know.

dlawrenncar commented 1 year ago

I am looking for these diagnostics for the CESM Project meeting next week, ideally after the runs have gone a bit further.

On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 10:52 AM Keith Oleson @.***> wrote:

I've been running LMWG diagnostics on these coupled cases fairly regularly. In general, they can be found at: https://webext.cgd.ucar.edu/BLT1850/

For 054 in particular:

https://webext.cgd.ucar.edu/BLT1850/b.e23_alpha16b.BLT1850.ne30_t232.054/lnd/b.e23_alpha16b.BLT1850.ne30_t232.054.25_44-b.cesm3_cam058_mom_e.B1850WscMOM.ne30_L58_t061.camdev_cice5.026g.25_44/setsIndex.html

Trends are through year 44. The simulation is now through year 54. I'll update the diags when I'm back in the office. The comparison for these have been to 026g, but if there is a better control case for these let me know.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/NCAR/amwg_dev/issues/420#issuecomment-1806170518, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFABYVFHHORXIOBZI6EVNRTYDZSXRAVCNFSM6AAAAAA7AF3HOCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQMBWGE3TANJRHA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

wwieder commented 1 year ago

@olyson you're amazing. Thanks!

@cecilehannay or @adamrher, do you have a suggestions for what case we should be comparing 054 to? Alternatively, @dlawrenncar would it be more productive to compare with an I case?

dlawrenncar commented 1 year ago

I don't know that we would have a relevant I-case that would correspond to a pre-industrial control, but I guess we could extend a spinup. That does seem like the kind of comparison we could/should be doing on a quasi-regular basis.

On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 2:00 PM will wieder @.***> wrote:

@olyson https://github.com/olyson you're amazing. Thanks!

@cecilehannay https://github.com/cecilehannay or @adamrher https://github.com/adamrher, do you have a suggestions for what case we should be comparing 054 to? Alternatively, @dlawrenncar https://github.com/dlawrenncar would it be more productive to compare with an I case?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/NCAR/amwg_dev/issues/420#issuecomment-1806423692, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFABYVESHRVHFPIJ73ROTDDYD2IWHAVCNFSM6AAAAAA7AF3HOCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQMBWGQZDGNRZGI . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

olyson commented 12 months ago

Diagnostics of 054 compared to a recent extended spinup (our GSWP3 control [https://github.com/NCAR/LMWG_dev/issues/1] for the dead arctic vegetation investigation [https://github.com/NCAR/LMWG_dev/discussions/3]:

https://webext.cgd.ucar.edu/BLT1850/b.e23_alpha16b.BLT1850.ne30_t232.054/lnd/b.e23_alpha16b.BLT1850.ne30_t232.054.35_54-ctsm51_cesm23a16bctsm51d130_ne30pg3ne30pg3mg17_GSWP3V1_1850.11_20/setsIndex.html

olyson commented 12 months ago

Diagnostics of 054 compared to a segment of the CESM2 pi control are here:

https://webext.cgd.ucar.edu/BLT1850/b.e23_alpha16b.BLT1850.ne30_t232.054/lnd/b.e23_alpha16b.BLT1850.ne30_t232.054.35_54-b.e21.B1850.f09_g17.CMIP6-piControl.001.1080_1099/setsIndex.html

wwieder commented 12 months ago

thanks @olyson I'll swap out some of the slides in the deck for today's meeting

olyson commented 12 months ago

Ha, I just sent you an email suggesting that, sorry.

NCAR / amwg_dev

b.e23_alpha16b.BLT1850.ne30_t232.054 #420