b.e23_alpha16g.BLT1850.ne30_t232.072

[cecilehannay]

Purpose: Given the large ENSO impacts of the gust addition in https://github.com/NCAR/amwg_dev/issues/440, we want to try reducing the magnitude of the added gusts.

---

Description: Same as https://github.com/NCAR/amwg_dev/issues/440, but with the ugust function having reduced coefficients (so the SourceMod for shr_flux_mod would change but nothing else).

---

Case directory:

• Locally (if still available): /glade/p/cesmdata/cseg/runs/cesm2_0/b.e23_alpha16g.BLT1850.ne30_t232.072

• On github: https://github.com/NCAR/amwg_dev/tree/b.e23_alpha16g.BLT1850.ne30_t232.072

  ---

  Sandbox:

• Locally (if still available): /glade/work/hannay/cesm_tags/cesm2_3_alpha16g

• On github: https://github.com/ESCOMP/cesm/tree/cesm2_3_alpha16g

  ---

  Diagnostics:

• Diags (if available): https://webext.cgd.ucar.edu/BLT1850/b.e23_alpha16g.BLT1850.ne30_t232.072/

  ---

  Output:

• Raw output on derecho (if still available): /glade/derecho/scratch/hannay/archive/b.e23_alpha16g.BLT1850.ne30_t232.072/

• CAM Climos: /glade/campaign/cgd/amp/amwg/climo/b.e23_alpha16g.BLT1850.ne30_t232.072

  ---

  Contacts: @cecilehannay @megandevlan, @swrneale, @PeterHjortLauritzen

  ---

  Extra details:

[swrneale]

It's early, but as hoped, it pretty much lies right between 54 and 64 wrt to ENSO amplitude. Need to understand why now!

[cecilehannay]

Meg requested 20ish years in #450 for this run Do we need to extend it?

[swrneale]

I wouldn't mind extending ti a bit more as the magnitude is starting to drop off a bit. And 50 years would be good for Meg's paper and deeper side-by-side comparison with 54 and 64 I would say.