Open cecilehannay opened 10 months ago
It's early, but as hoped, it pretty much lies right between 54 and 64 wrt to ENSO amplitude. Need to understand why now!
Meg requested 20ish years in #450 for this run Do we need to extend it?
I wouldn't mind extending ti a bit more as the magnitude is starting to drop off a bit. And 50 years would be good for Meg's paper and deeper side-by-side comparison with 54 and 64 I would say.
Purpose: Given the large ENSO impacts of the gust addition in https://github.com/NCAR/amwg_dev/issues/440, we want to try reducing the magnitude of the added gusts.
Description: Same as https://github.com/NCAR/amwg_dev/issues/440, but with the ugust function having reduced coefficients (so the SourceMod for shr_flux_mod would change but nothing else).
Case directory:
Locally (if still available):
/glade/p/cesmdata/cseg/runs/cesm2_0/b.e23_alpha16g.BLT1850.ne30_t232.072
On github: https://github.com/NCAR/amwg_dev/tree/b.e23_alpha16g.BLT1850.ne30_t232.072
Sandbox:
Locally (if still available):
/glade/work/hannay/cesm_tags/cesm2_3_alpha16g
On github: https://github.com/ESCOMP/cesm/tree/cesm2_3_alpha16g
Diagnostics:
Diags (if available): https://webext.cgd.ucar.edu/BLT1850/b.e23_alpha16g.BLT1850.ne30_t232.072/
Output:
Raw output on derecho (if still available):
/glade/derecho/scratch/hannay/archive/b.e23_alpha16g.BLT1850.ne30_t232.072/
CAM Climos:
/glade/campaign/cgd/amp/amwg/climo/b.e23_alpha16g.BLT1850.ne30_t232.072
Contacts: @cecilehannay @megandevlan, @swrneale, @PeterHjortLauritzen
Extra details: