Open cecilehannay opened 8 months ago
@cecilehannay, based on your experience running recent coupled configurations, which runs have better numerical stability: runs that use the CLUBB taus code, or runs that use the old Lscale code? If you've seen crashes, do you have a guess as to what is causing them? Thanks, Vince.
We have seen more crash with the tau code than with the old Lscale. WE have not determined the reason of the crashes yet.
I got two different errors.
@bstephens82 also had some random crashes and he might be able to add on that..
Diags for warm branch versus cold branch are here
Just adding in the regional precip. biases plots for cold and warm branches, and comparison to previous model releases.
Purpose: Continue testing taus code.
Description: Same as 77 (https://github.com/NCAR/amwg_dev/issues/484) but with optimized dycore, new pe_layout and tuning of dcs.
user_nl-cam
Dycore sourcemods
env_mach_pes.xml
Case directory:
Locally (if still available):
/glade/p/cesmdata/cseg/runs/cesm2_0/b.e23_alpha16g.BLT1850.ne30_t232.080
On github: https://github.com/NCAR/amwg_dev/tree/b.e23_alpha16g.BLT1850.ne30_t232.080
Sandbox:
Locally (if still available):
/glade/work/hannay/cesm_tags/cesm2_3_alpha16g
On github: https://github.com/ESCOMP/cesm/tree/cesm2_3_alpha16g
Diagnostics:
Diags (if available): https://webext.cgd.ucar.edu/BLT1850/b.e23_alpha16g.BLT1850.ne30_t232.080/
Output:
Raw output on derecho (if still available):
/glade/derecho/scratch/hannay/archive/b.e23_alpha16g.BLT1850.ne30_t232.080/
CAM Climos:
/glade/campaign/cgd/amp/amwg/climo/b.e23_alpha16g.BLT1850.ne30_t232.080
Contacts: @bstephens82 @JulioTBacmeister @adamrher @vlarson @zarzycki @PeterHjortLauritzen @cecilehannay
Extra details: