Open cecilehannay opened 6 months ago
@cecilehannay I know this is a bit of an old run now, but would it be possible to extend to 60 years? Hoping to get some more robust ENSO statistics that are comparable with the 1x gust case after talking more with @swrneale today.
@megandevlan: I still have the restart files so it is no problem to extent
Purpose: Test new gustiness formulation to align with Redelsperger et al (2000) with alpha = 0x (basically no gustiness)
Description: Same as 78b except use new formulation for gustiness with alpha = 0x
in shr_flux_mod.F90
Case directory:
Locally (if still available):
/glade/campaign/cesm/cesmdata/cseg/runs/cesm2_0/b.e23_alpha16g.BLT1850.ne30_t232.083b
On github: https://github.com/NCAR/amwg_dev/tree/b.e23_alpha16g.BLT1850.ne30_t232.083b
Sandbox:
Locally (if still available):
/glade/work/hannay/cesm_tags/cesm2_3_alpha16g
On github: https://github.com/ESCOMP/cesm/tree/cesm2_3_alpha16g
Diagnostics:
Diags (if available): https://webext.cgd.ucar.edu/BLT1850/b.e23_alpha16g.BLT1850.ne30_t232.083b/
Output:
Raw output on derecho (if still available):
/glade/derecho/scratch/hannay/archive/b.e23_alpha16g.BLT1850.ne30_t232.083b/
CAM Climos:
/glade/campaign/cgd/amp/amwg/climo/b.e23_alpha16g.BLT1850.ne30_t232.083b
Contacts: @cecilehannay, @megandevlan, @swrneale, @PeterHjortLauritzen, @adamrher, @JulioTBacmeister, @gustavo-marques
Extra details: